語音與即時代理的最低延遲推論 API:以首次Token時間(TTFT)為優先的基準測試

2026年8月30日 21:24
站內 AI 整理稿

Time to first token (TTFT) is the metric teams use to pick an inference API for voice.It is also the metric that misleads them.TTFT marks when generation starts; a text-to-speech model cannot speak until a full clause arrives.

Between those two points sits the difference between an agent that feels conversational and one that gets interrupted.This piece benchmarks every layer of the voice stack including LLM, speech-to-text, text-to-speech, and speech-to-speech.

Why TTFT Is the Right Entry Point and the Wrong Finish Line A voice agent is a latency budget with a language model inside it.Every stage spends milliseconds the user can hear.Time to first token (TTFT) is the interval between sending an inference request and receiving the first token back.

IBM’s definition frames it as the moment a system transitions from idle to visibly active.For chat, TTFT is close to the whole story.For voice, it is one term in a sum.The reason is mechanical.A text-to-speech model cannot synthesize half a word.

It needs a complete clause or sentence before it produces audio.LiveKit calls the resulting metric time-to-first-sentence (TTFS), and argues in its Gemma 4 deployment post that TTFS is what users actually feel.That gives you two knobs rather than one.TTFT controls when generation starts.

Tokens per second controls how fast the first sentence completes.A provider that wins one and loses the other will not feel fast.

The Latency Budget: What One Voice Turn Actually Costs LiveKit’s voice agents overview breaks a turn into STT at roughly 100–200ms, LLM at 300–500ms with streaming, TTS at 100–200ms, and network at 50–150ms over WebRTC.It puts the practical end-to-end target at 700ms to 1.2s.

Kwindla Hultman Kramer, co-creator of Pipecat, has advised targeting 800ms median voice-to-voice latency, with a looser 1,500ms acceptable for a proof of concept.

His rough arithmetic splits that four ways at roughly 200ms each: transport and media processing, STT plus phrase endpointing, LLM inference, and TTS.Daily’s earlier work on the fastest voice bot supplies the human baseline.Typical human response time in conversation is around 500ms.

Pauses beyond 800ms start to feel unnatural.Daily’s February 2026 voice-agent LLM benchmark translates that into an LLM requirement directly.

Natural conversation needs voice-to-voice under 1,500ms, which works out to roughly 700ms of TTFT budget for a text-mode LLM inside a transcription-to-LLM-to-voice harness.That 700ms number is the bar to hold every provider against.

How to Read a TTFT Benchmark Without Being Misled Before the tables, five methodology facts that change what the numbers mean: 1.Workload shape dominates: Artificial Analysis changed its default workload in March 2026.The site now reports 10k input token prompts rather than 1k.

Longer prompts raise both TTFT and output speed.LiveKit argues this is closer to reality for voice, because production agents front-load policy, persona, escalation rules, retrieved data, and tool schemas.2.

Server location is baked in: Artificial Analysis tests from a virtual machine in Google Cloud’s us-central1-a zone.It states plainly that TTFT includes network latency and may advantage or disadvantage providers based on where they serve.3.

Reasoning tokens count: In the Artificial Analysis definition, TTFT for a reasoning model is the first reasoning token, not the first answer token.Those are separate columns.4.Measure from the receiving side: Daily notes that model providers sometimes quote TTFT internal to their inference stacks.

Daily measures from request send to first usable token off the API.5.Runs are not repeatable: Daily is blunt about this: TTFT varies substantially between benchmark runs, and providers change inference stacks and sometimes weights without changing model names.

Layer 1: LLM Time to First Token Figures below are from the Artificial Analysis API providers leaderboard, retrieved August 30, 2026.The “first chunk” column is TTFT.Workload is 10k input tokens, single prompt, median over 72 hours.

Lowest measured first-chunk latency ProviderModelTTFTOutput speedBasetengpt-oss-120b (high)0.23s266 tok/sBasetengpt-oss-120b (low)0.24s271 tok/sDeepInfraNemotron 3 Ultra0.28s371 tok/sCohereNorth Mini Code0.32s104 tok/sCohereCommand A+0.40s239 tok/sBasetenInkling Small0.

42s337 tok/sModularGemma 4 31B (NVFP4)0.44s243 tok/sNebiusGLM-5.3-Flash0.46s206 tok/sFireworksNemotron 3.5 Lightning0.46s501 tok/sTogether AIKimi K2.7 Code0.47s245 tok/sCerebrasgpt-oss-120b (high)0.

49s1,697 tok/s The throughput trap Silicon vendors optimize for a different metric than voice agents need.ProviderModelTTFTOutput speedCerebrasgpt-oss-120b (high)0.49s1,697 tok/sCelerisCeleris-10.62s1,612 tok/sCerebrasGemma 4 31B0.53s1,351 tok/sGroqgpt-oss-20b (high)0.

82s957 tok/sSambaNovagpt-oss-120b (high)0.92s706 tok/sGroqgpt-oss-120b (low)0.69s473 tok/sInceptionMercury 23.07s770 tok/s Mercury 2 is the clearest illustration.It is a diffusion-based language model, and it generates 770 tokens per second.Its first chunk arrives at 3.07s.

That is four times the entire LLM budget for a natural conversation.Cerebras and Groq are a different case.Their TTFT is respectable and their throughput is exceptional.For TTFS specifically, that combination is strong, because the sentence completes almost immediately after the first token lands.

Frontier and proprietary endpoints ProviderModelTTFTOutput speedAmazon BedrockGPT-5.6 Luna (non-reasoning)0.59s181 tok/sAmazon BedrockGPT-5.6 Terra (non-reasoning)0.72s103 tok/sOpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (non-reasoning)0.74s113 tok/sGoogleGemini 3.7 Flash (low), AI Studio0.84s315 tok/sAnthropicClaude 4.

5 Haiku (non-reasoning)0.84s82 tok/sAmazon BedrockNova Micro0.86s264 tok/sGoogleGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal), AI Studio0.90s202 tok/sOpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol (non-reasoning)1.06s71 tok/s Note the same model on different hosts.GPT-5.6 Luna non-reasoning measures 0.59s on Amazon Bedrock and 0.

74s on OpenAI’s own API.Hosting and routing matter as much as the weights.The vendor-measured outlier LiveKit publishes TTFT figures for its own inference product.Gemma 4 31B on LiveKit Inference measured 192ms, against Gemini 2.5 Flash at 911ms, GPT-5.5 at 966ms, GPT-4.

1 at 1,006ms, and the same Gemma 4 31B via OpenRouter at 1,876ms.LiveKit is transparent about the mechanism, which makes the claim more credible than most.It runs Gemma behind SGLang with speculative decoding, and deliberately under-packs each GPU so queueing delay stays low.

A warm request, it says, starts returning tokens in around 100ms.The tradeoff is cost, at $1.20 per 1M output tokens.The same post reports TTFS across full conversations: 354ms for Gemma 4 31B on LiveKit, 1,034ms for Gemini 2.5 Flash, 1,088ms for GPT-4.1, 1,267ms for Gemini 3.

0 Flash, and 1,404ms for GPT-5.5.Capability numbers accompany it.On IFBench, independently scored by Artificial Analysis, Gemma 4 31B scores 75.6% against GPT-5.5 at 75.9%, GPT-4.1 at 43%, and Gemini 2.5 Flash at 39%.On τ²-bench, GPT-5.5 leads at 93.9% with Gemma 4 31B at 76.9%.

Layer 2: Speech-to-Text and Turn Detection For voice, STT latency is not transcription speed.It is how long after the user stops talking the pipeline knows the user stopped talking.

Artificial Analysis measures two things on its streaming STT leaderboard, both starting from a SileroVAD-detected end of speech: time to first partial transcript, and time to final transcript.

Its AA-WER Streaming index draws on roughly 8 hours of audio, weighted AA-AgentTalk 50%, VoxPopuli 25%, Earnings-22 25%.

Vendor-published latency figures: ModelClaimSource typeDeepgram Flux~260ms p50 end-of-turn detection at defaultsVendor docsDeepgram Nova-3Sub-300ms streaming latencyVendor docsAssemblyAI Universal-Streaming~300ms immutable word emissionVendorCartesia Ink-2100ms transcript latencyVendorSpeechmatics Voice SDK0.

451 ± 0.022s end-of-speech to finalsVendor internal tool Deepgram Flux is the most architecturally inter

Related

相關文章

搶在對頭上市前“吸金”!OpenAI 緊急開啟 300 億美元新融資,估值衝向 1.4 萬億美元

OpenAI 緊急開啟 300 億美元新融資,估值衝向 1.4 萬億美元發布於AI新閒資訊時間 :Oct 20, 2026閱讀 :1分鐘隨著人工智能前沿競賽進入白熱化階段,AI 領域的兩巨頭正在資本市場上演一場爭分奪秒的資金爭奪戰。據路透社援引知情人士消息透露,OpenAI 目前正爭分奪秒地爭取投資者承諾,力求在競爭對手 Anthropic 預計於11月中旬 IPO 上市之前,加速完成自身的新一輪融資。

21 分鐘前5900
雷峰網生成式AI

射頻計算:探索智能邊界|CNCC 2026

來源:物聯網研究與創新文章鏈接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/JVhpxoANJIjLvIfi8YiUqQ從信號感知到空間認知,從可編程電磁環境到無源智能系統,射頻計算正從對物理信號的處理走向對智能形態的重塑。射頻計算是指在射頻空間內對射頻信號做變換從而完成相應的信息處理和轉換的過程,其內涵正隨人工智能的深度滲透而不斷拓展。

10 小時前
智東西生成式AI

正面硬剛DeepSeek!MiniMax M3.1 Flash發佈,輸出捲到200+TPS,價格砍到1/2

作者 | 王涵 編輯 | 漠影 火爆AI圈的匿名模型Space Bunny,終於被認領了! 10月19日報道,剛剛,MiniMax 正式發佈M3.1 Flash,定位為Coding/Agent優化輕量級模型,擁有100萬token上下文。 幾乎前後腳,10月17日,DeepSeek V4.1 Flash-1017上線。(梁聖又掀桌了!DeepSeek新模型斬殺GPT-6,許願式編程時代降臨) 根據M3.

10 小時前
雷峰網生成式AI

華中師大 CoReFuse-Med:先淨化再融合,讓低質模態不再拖後腿|ACM MM 2026

來源:多模態信息融合文章鏈接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/SVr9DmtPyzORLYad-tNR-g多模態融合何時失效?ACM MM 2026 · CoReFuse-Med多模態並不是越多越好。當MRI已經空間對齊,但是T1、T2、FLAIR等模態的採樣質量差別很大時,低質量模態可能會把高質量模態中產生的重採樣偽影一起帶入到融合網絡中去。CoReFuse-Med從淺層汙染和深層模態偏置這兩個方面來對症下藥地進行修復。

13 小時前
智東西生成式AI

Jev剛火,國產29B開源模型來踢館了!不光會判斷,還能直接填參數

作者 | 江宇 編輯 | 漠影 AI行業正被一個叫Jev的模型攪動。 這款由TypeSafe AI發佈的“系統一模型”,驗證了一個此前被忽視的判斷:意圖理解這類高頻、低延遲的任務,未必非要勞駕千億參數的大模型“硬想”,專用模型同樣能做到又快又準。一時間,決策層與生成層分離,成了AI Agent落地的熱門話題。 但Jev留下了一個問題:判斷出用戶想做什麼之後,誰來負責把事情交代清楚? 例如,用戶說“把展廳東側的燈調到80%、色溫4000K,西側調到30%、2700K,入口燈別動”。

13 小時前