Perplexity and NVIDIA Researchers Introduce JOLT: a Joint Teacher-Student Reinforcement Learning Method

2026年10月22日 04:56
站內 AI 整理稿

Perplexity, along with NVIDIA team, has introduced JOLT, a new post-training method for language models.JOLT stands for Joint On-policy Learning and Teaching.It trains a single model in 2 roles.The teacher sees privileged information; the student does not.

The key change is that the teacher is trained too, so its feedback stays usable.On MATH, JOLT matched GRPO’s accuracy with 6.5x fewer processed training tokens.For teams running RL post-training, that is a direct compute question.TL;DR What it is: a post-training method.Size: tested on Qwen3-0.

6B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct, Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct and DeepSeek-V2-Lite.Runs on: 1 shared model plays both roles, so no separate teacher model.Training hardware: Not disclosed.Performance: JOLT+ posts the highest mean score in every setting tested against GRPO, OPSD and π-Distill.

Best: AppWorld state-test pass rate of 72.09% with JOLT+, vs 62.20% for GRPO (+9.9 points).Worst: JOLT without student reward scores 51.92% on AppWorld, below GRPO.What is Perplexity JOLT?JOLT is a self-distillation method from Perplexity and NVIDIA that trains one model as teacher and student.

It builds on On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD).Why does RL post-training need a better teacher?Outcome-reward RL, such as GRPO, gives one reward per attempt.That signal is sparse.It does not say which tokens helped.On long agentic tasks, successes are rare, so learning is slow.

On-Policy Distillation fixes sparsity by having a stronger teacher score each student token.OPSD removes the separate teacher.The same model becomes the teacher when given privileged context, such as a verified solution.The research team argues this is not enough.

A teacher holding the answer can take shortcuts the student cannot follow.Its guidance may sit beyond the student’s reach.In the paper, OPSD’s teacher-student disagreement grows during MATH training.How does JOLT work?

JOLT trains both roles of one shared model at the same time: Teacher: gets privileged information.It learns from outcome rewards, plus a KL penalty that keeps it close to the student.Student: sees only the task.It learns from the teacher’s token-level distillation signal on its own attempts.

On-policy: each role learns from trajectories generated under its own context.JOLT+: adds the student’s own outcome reward to the student update.The research stands in the center on a ‘reward-consistent’ teacher.Its distillation update should point the same way as the student’s reward gradient.

The ideal teacher favors high-advantage actions while staying near the student’s policy.(function(){var f=document.getElementById('mtp-jolt-embed');window.addEventListener('message',function(e){if(e.data&&e.data.mtpJoltHeight&&f){f.style.height=e.data.

mtpJoltHeight+'px';}});})(); How does JOLT perform on benchmarks?The research team tested 5 settings, each with a different base model and type of privileged information: GSM8K: DeepSeek-V2-Lite; teacher gets the verified answer.MATH: Qwen3-0.6B; teacher gets worked reference solutions.

LiveCodeBench v6: Qwen3-8B on 131 problems; teacher gets a passing sibling solution or execution feedback.AppWorld: Qwen3-4B-Instruct; teacher gets summaries of past attempts.Terminal-Bench 2.1: Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct trained on TMax; teacher gets private verifier files.

JOLT+ had the highest mean score in every setting.Against GRPO, the strongest baseline, it gained 1.5 points on GSM8K.It also gained 4.2 on MATH, 3.0 on LCBv6 and 9.9 on AppWorld.On Terminal-Bench 2.1, JOLT+ reached 10.96% pass@1 and 34.83% [email protected] scored 8.25% and 30.34%.

Even plain JOLT, with no student reward, beat GRPO on MATH: 72.14% versus 68.36%.How much training compute does JOLT save?On MATH, the research team fit accuracy curves against training-token budgets.At 63.44% accuracy, GRPO’s checkpoint used 8.40M processed training tokens.

JOLT’s fitted curve needed 1.30M, a 6.5x reduction.Counting completion tokens only, the gap widens to about 13x.Across 55% to 65% accuracy targets, savings range from 4.3x to 7.4x on processed tokens.JOLT also levels off higher.It plateaus near 72%, against about 70% for GRPO and 62% for OPSD.

How does JOLT compare with GRPO, OPSD and π-Distill?All scores below come from Perplexity’s own runs in the JOLT paper, with hyperparameters tuned per method.Method descriptions link to each method’s own paper.

FeatureJOLTJOLT+GRPOOPSDπ-DistillSeparate teacher modelNoNoNo teacherNo (self-teacher)No (shared model)Teacher is trainedYes (reward + KL to student)Yes (reward + KL to student)Not applicableNoYes (KL-regularized)Student signalDense distillation, on-policyDistillation + outcome rewardGroup-relative outcome rewardDense distillation, on-policyOff-policy, teacher trajectoriesMATH, Qwen3-0.

6B (%)72.14 ± 0.9072.59 ± 1.1768.36 ± 3.7361.20 ± 2.1042.25 ± 1.10LCBv6, Qwen3-8B (%)47.64 ± 1.1049.08 ± 0.4146.13 ± 1.8345.34 ± 1.5038.23 ± 1.72AppWorld, Qwen3-4B (%)51.92 ± 5.3072.09 ± 6.0162.20 ± 2.8329.49 ± 2.4859.85 ± 2.97Terminal-Bench 2.1 pass@1 (%)6.5610.968.252.824.99Terminal-Bench 2.

1 pass@32 (%)25.6934.8330.3416.9022.31CodeNot yet releasedNot yet releasedNot disclosedGitHubNot disclosed Terminal-Bench base model: 5.18% pass@1, 22.81% [email protected] Takeaways 1 model plays teacher and student, and the teacher is trained too.6.

5x fewer processed tokens than GRPO at matched MATH accuracy.JOLT+ beats GRPO by 9.9 points on AppWorld.Plain JOLT still trails GRPO on AppWorld and Terminal-Bench.Check out the paper on arXiv and the Perplexity research blog post.All credit goes to the researcher of this project.

Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.?

Connect with us The post Perplexity and NVIDIA Researchers Introduce JOLT: a Joint Teacher-Student Reinforcement Learning Method appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Related

相關文章

雷峰網模型更新

靳玉志:自動駕駛將重構新的出行方式

10月21日,2026世界智能網聯汽車大會在北京舉行。華為公司高級副總裁、引望公司CEO靳玉志出席巔峰對話環節,圍繞智能化下半場的變化、引望在技術生態中的角色等話題分享了觀點。靳玉志指出,“智能化下半場”正發生三大變化。第一是產業加速從輔助駕駛邁向自動駕駛。根據工信部統計數據,截至今年9月,L2及以上輔助駕駛搭載率已達到70%。工信部正有序開展L3級自動駕駛准入測試,強標也已正式發佈,並將於2027年7月1日起正式落地實施,我認為這一政策給整個產業發展奠定了非常好的基礎。第二是自動駕駛對安全的要求更高。

3 小時前
雷峰網模型更新

全球算力價格指數啟動 九章雲極核心共建算力定價基準

10月21日,全球算力價格指數及綜合信息服務平臺在金融街論壇正式啟動。該指數由中國經濟信息社發起建設,旨在填補算力定價基準空白、完善算力價格形成體系,推動建立具有自主知識產權的中國算力價格基準。北京九章雲極科技股份有限公司(下稱“九章雲極”)作為核心共建單位參與建設。當前,人工智能產業快速發展,算力需求持續攀升,算力產業進入加速發展階段。與此同時,算力市場仍缺乏統一的定價基準與公認的價格標尺,制約了產業協同與市場交易的效率。

4 小時前
雷峰網模型更新

好逛又好買!抖音商城雙11熱賣商品榜發佈

本文作者: Nemo 2026-10-22 09:51 導語:這10款熱賣商品,既是秋冬消費趨勢的直觀呈現,也是商家洞察需求、優化選品的參考。10月15日,2026抖音商城雙11好物節正式開啟,橫跨秋冬換季、囤貨等消費節點,平臺以消費券、立減折扣等多重優惠疊加發力,為用戶帶來好逛又好買的雙11好物節。

4 小時前
何夕2077模型更新

清華系千訣發佈預測式世界模型

世界模型賽道新看點:千訣隱變量可辨識性方向的研究,比LeCun相近工作早一年,不堆畫面預測,主打物理規律與跨本體複用。 田晏林 發自 凹非寺 量子位 | 公眾號 QbitAI 世界模型這條賽道,越來越有全球頂尖AI高手過招的架勢了! Yann LeCun持續押注預測式世界模型,李飛飛帶領World Labs探索可交互的3D世界,全球頭部AI團隊正沿著不同技術路線加速探索。

6 小時前
Hugging Face Blog模型更新

How Specializing the Vocabulary of SLMs Can Cut Inference Cost by 77% in Real Applications

Back to Articles How Specializing the Vocabulary of SLMs Can Cut Inference Cost by 77% in Real Applications Team Article Published October 21, 2026 Upvote 1 Bernardo França de Aguiar bernardoaguiar Follow Dharma-AI Gabriel Pimenta de Freitas Cardoso GabrielPimenta99 Follow Dharma-AI Bruno Duarte brunoduarte01 Follow Dharma-AI Francisco de Almeida Rocha Alves falves9101 Follow Dharma-AI Models specialized for a domain or a task by fine-tuning general open-source models, such as Qwen and Gemma, inherit a vocabulary built for many domains and general applications.

12 小時前