MiniMax Just Launched M3.1 Flash: 428B MoE Agentic Model at $0.15/M Input

2026年10月19日 12:37
站內 AI 整理稿

MiniMax has just released MiniMax M3.1 Flash on its API, priced at $0.15 per 1M input tokens.MiniMax also confirmed that Space Bunny was an earlier M3.1 Flash build.That stealth model processed over 200T tokens.For developers, the message is near-frontier agentic scores at Flash-tier cost.

Model weights are due in late October, 2026.TL;DR Size: 428B total parameters, about 23B active (MoE); 1,000,000-token context Runs on: MiniMax API, M Plan and MiniMax Code today.

Self-hosting hardware not disclosed; weights arrive Oct 23 Performance: Near-frontier on agentic office work, mid-pack on hard coding, all MiniMax-reported Best: Automation-Bench v1.0.6 at 62.2, the top score in MiniMax’s table Worst: Terminal Bench 4.0 at 38.1, versus 51.

8 for Opus 5 What is MiniMax M3.1 Flash?MiniMax M3.1 Flash is a multimodal mixture-of-experts model from MiniMax.It targets coding, agentic office work and visual reasoning.MiniMax’s product page lists 428B total parameters and about 23B active.

It also mentions sparse attention and a native visual encoder.The model accepts text, image and video input and returns text.The context window is 1,000,000 tokens.Those parameter totals match MiniMax M3, which ships at ~428B total and ~23B active.

MiniMax has not published a technical report on what changed in the Flash variant.How does reasoning work in M3.1 Flash?Reasoning is always on and cannot be disabled.Developers choose from 5 effort levels: Low, Medium, High, Xhigh and Max.MiniMax recommends Max as the default.Migration matters here.

Requests sending thinking.type=disabled or effort=none return an error.Reasoning arrives in a separate reasoning_content field, which may be absent.Integrations that parse inline tags from M3 need updating.How does M3.1 Flash perform on benchmarks?All scores below are MiniMax-reported.

No independent replication exists yet.On the CoWork set, M3.1 Flash leads Automation-Bench v1.0.6 at 62.2.Opus 5 scores 50.3 and GPT-5.6 Sol 45.8.It ties Opus 5 on BankerToolBench at 76.2.It also tops LOCA-Bench 256K at 60.3.Agents’ Last Exam lands at 29.6.Coding results are mixed.DeepSWE v1.

1 scores 73.7, just above GPT-5.6 Sol at 73.0.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 scores higher at 77.0.Terminal Bench 4.0 is the weakest result at 38.1.SWE Refactor Bench sits at 23.0, versus 31.0 for Opus 5.On vision, BabyVision with tools reaches 91.0 and CharXiv RQ reaches 82.5.HLE without tools scores 43.

4.Spot checks hold up.The Kimi K3 model card reports DeepSWE 67.5 and BabyVision 85.7, matching MiniMax’s table.One inconsistency: MiniMax’s cost chart plots Automation-Bench max effort at 62.8, while its table says 62.2.What does M3.1 Flash cost per task?

MiniMax frames value as cost per task, not per token.On its Automation-Bench chart, all 5 effort levels sit below $0.05 per task.Scores range from 52.8 at low effort to 62.8 at max.A full 152-task Agents’ Last Exam run cost about $111 at 29.6.On DeepSWE, DeepSeek V4.

1 Flash-1017 plots both higher and cheaper at max effort.window.addEventListener('message',function(e){if(e.data&&e.data.mmxHeight){var f=document.getElementById('mmx31f-frame');if(f)f.style.height=e.data.mmxHeight+'px';}}); How do you deploy MiniMax M3.1 Flash?The model is live on platform.minimax.

io as MiniMax-M3.1-Flash.MiniMax supports Anthropic-compatible and OpenAI-compatible access, including Chat Completions and Responses.It is also available through M Plan and the MiniMax Code desktop app.Pricing is a flat $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens.Cache reads cost $0.015 per 1M.

There is no long-context surcharge.MiniMax M3 costs $0.30/$1.20 up to 512K input and doubles above that.Per token, Flash is half of M3’s standard rate.MiniMax claims 1/3 the cost of M3 but has not detailed the calculation.On speed, MiniMax’s product page lists about 150 tokens per second.

The announcement claims 3x the speed of M3.Weights arrive October 23; the license is not yet disclosed.For scale, M3’s MXFP8 build is about 440 GB.How does M3.1 Flash compare with DeepSeek, Kimi and GLM?FeatureMiniMax M3.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3GLM-5.

3Total / active params428B / ~23B (MiniMax)552B / 8B prefill, 16B decode (NVIDIA card)2.

8T / 104B (HF)~744B / ~40B, shared GLM-5 baseContext1M1M (DeepSeek docs)1,048,5761,048,576 (Cloudflare)InputsText, image, videoText, imageText, imageTextWeights / licenseDue Oct 23; license not disclosedOpen, MITOpen, Kimi K3 LicenseOpen weightsAPI price in / out (1M)$0.15 / $0.60 flat$0.30 / $1.

20 peak; half off-peak$3.00 / $15.00$1.40 / $4.40Self-host hardwareNot disclosedNot disclosedMXFP4 weights; vLLM, SGLangNot disclosedAutomation-Bench v1.0.662.254.846.748.8DeepSWE v1.173.774.267.566.9Terminal Bench 4.038.131.212.637.9BabyVision (w/ tools)91.089.685.

7Not reported *Scores from MiniMax’s comparison table.Kimi K3 DeepSWE and BabyVision match its own card.What are the limitations?Every benchmark is vendor-reported, and harness choice shifts results.Automation-Bench numbers do not transfer across sources.Kimi K3’s card reports 30.

8 on a 600-task public subset, while MiniMax lists 46.7.Opus 5 leads by 13.7 points on Terminal Bench 4.0 and 14.1 on NL2Repo-Bench.Always-on reasoning also sets a token and latency floor for simple calls.Self-hosting details remain unknown until October 23.

Key Takeaways 428B MoE with ~23B active and a 1M context.$0.15/$0.60 per 1M tokens, half of M3’s per-token rate.Leads Automation-Bench v1.0.6 at 62.2, MiniMax-reported.Trails Opus 5 by 13.7 points on Terminal Bench 4.0.Weights land Oct 23; reasoning cannot be disabled.

Check out the announcement, product page and API docs.All credit goes to the researcher of this project.Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.

The post MiniMax Just Launched M3.1 Flash: 428B MoE Agentic Model at $0.15/M Input appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Related

相關文章

智東西模型更新

騰訊混元煉出Agent版RSI!基於Qwen3.8-27B,終端任務成功率翻倍

(公眾號:zhidxcom) 編譯 | 黃菲 編輯 | 江宇 10月19日消息,10月15日,由騰訊首席AI科學家、騰訊基礎模型部負責人姚順雨帶領的騰訊混元前沿團隊(Tencent Hy Frontier)聯合新加坡國立大學、美國馬里蘭大學、佐治亞大學和印第安納大學的研究人員,以阿里巴巴通義千問團隊開源的Qwen3.8-27B為基座,提出一種面向終端智能體(Terminal Agent)的遞歸訓練方法Terminal-RSI。 該研究旨在讓終端智能體從過往的成功經驗中學習,持續提升複雜任務的執行能力。

6 小時前

AI日報:火山引擎砸錢養AI劇;DeepSeek發佈API網頁搜索與抓取服務;騰訊Marvis上架麒麟軟件商店

字節火山引擎砸錢養AI劇:月度TOP10單部最高獎20萬火山引擎推出Seedance精品AI劇激勵計劃,本質是以真金白銀補貼撬動內容生態,將模型、工具、平臺與分發渠道(紅果短劇)深度綁定。50%現金+50%返券的獎勵結構設計精巧,既降低現金支出,又強制創作者回流字節自家工具生態,形成使用慣性。

7 小時前5300
雷峰網模型更新

光量子計算,距離真正的產業化還有多遠?

導語:產業化落地,光量子計算的新考場記者:郭思編輯:包永剛 摩爾定律走到紅利盡頭,AI、新藥研發、新材料探索對算力的需求還在不斷擴張。依靠持續堆 GPU 提升算力的老路越來越不划算,存算一體、Chiplet、光互連等技術競相尋找算力增量,量子計算因此被寄予厚望,光量子路線更是長期收到行業關注與討論。它在實驗室創下震撼的量子優越性記錄,其工程化進展與產業化時間表也始終是業界關注的焦點。 光量子計算,會成為下一代算力的破局鑰匙,還是一場尚待產業化驗證的技術革命?

9 小時前
雷峰網模型更新

獨家|前Graphcore總裁盧濤加入銘芯啟睿,要把LPU做成「高鐵」

銘芯啟睿(MemSilicon)CEO兼聯合創始人 盧濤獨家獲悉,銘芯啟睿(MemSilicon)已完成超4億元A輪融資,本輪融資由博原資本領投,博世創投、創領資本、米哈遊、中關村科學城公司、兆易創新等跟投,老股東復容投資、國開科創、恆裕資本、錦秋基金、順禧基金、小米戰投、中科創星持續加註。前Graphcore總裁兼大中華區總經理盧濤也已加入銘芯啟睿,擔任CEO兼聯合創始人。

10 小時前
雷峰網模型更新

Muse Wonder 建模大翻車,亞歷山大·王辯護遭馬斯克無情補刀

官方承認 3D 短板,跨模型測試 Harness 不同。 作者丨鄭佳美 編輯丨岑 峰 Meta 剛發佈的 Muse Wonder,沒想到因為一盞熔岩燈,在開發者社區引發了一場關於 AI 模型跑分的爭論。10 月 12 日,Meta 推出 Muse Wonder 和 Muse Wonder Full,主打 Coding Agent、工具調用和長任務執行能力。官方公佈的成績相當亮眼,Wonder Full 在 SWE-Marathon 上拿到 57.5 分,DeepSWE 1.1 達到 79.

11 小時前