在任意雲端執行 AI 工作負載,儲存於 Hugging Face:SkyPilot 零出口儲存方案
重點摘要
模型與資料集通常存放在單一雲端區域的儲存桶,但所需的 GPU 卻可能位於不同雲端,導致跨雲傳輸時需支付費用。Hugging Face 攜手 SkyPilot,將兩者無縫整合:數據保留在 Hub,計算則在任意擁有 GPU 的叢集上執行。只需透過 hf:// URL 與 HF_TOKEN 即可掛載 Hugging Face Bucket 或任何 Hub 倉儲至 SkyPilot 任務中。
Back to Articles Run AI workloads on any cloud, store on Hugging Face: zero-egress storage with SkyPilot Published July 7, 2026 Update on GitHub Upvote - Nikhil Jha njha Follow guest For most teams, models and datasets live in a bucket in one region of one cloud. The GPUs you can get, whether for development, training, or serving, increasingly sit on a different cloud than your data. The moment those two come apart, you pay a cross-cloud transfer tax just to read your own data onto your own GPUs. Together with Hugging Face, we've joined the two halves: your models and datasets stay on the Hub, and SkyPilot runs the compute (dev, training, or serving) on whatever cluster has the GPUs. Mount a Hugging Face Bucket or any Hub repo into a SkyPilot job with one hf:// URL and the HF_TOKEN you already have, then launch it wherever capacity is. Hugging Face charges no egress, so reading your data onto those GPUs costs nothing, on any cloud. Here's what's new: Your Hub data in any job. store: hf mounts a Hugging Face Bucket (read-write) or any model / dataset / Space repo (read-only) into a SkyPilot task with one hf:// URL and your existing HF_TOKEN, via MOUNT or COPY. Run it on any GPU, on any cloud. SkyPilot finds that job compute across 20+ clouds, Kubernetes, Slurm, and on-prem, so the same run uses whichever of your reserved or on-demand GPUs is available, on any vendor. No egress to read your data. Hugging Face Storage charges no egress or CDN fees, so wherever SkyPilot lands the job, it reads your models and datasets straight from the same bucket, with no per-cloud copies and no egress bill to pull them in. Xet-backed dedup. Buckets are built on Xet, so incremental checkpoints and model variants only store and transfer the chunks that changed. Built together. Hugging Face and SkyPilot shipped this jointly, and the Hugging Face team upstreamed the hf-mount FUSE fixes that make it work in unprivileged containers. Hugging Face Storage is now a first-class SkyPilot backend SkyPilot tasks already read and write cloud object stores (S3, GCS, Azure, R2, and many more) by mounting them at a local path. Hugging Face Storage now joins that list as store: hf, reached through the hf:// scheme: file_mounts: # A Hugging Face Bucket, read-write, for checkpoints, logs, processed data. /checkpoints: source: hf://buckets/my-org/qwen-sft store: hf mode: MOUNT # or COPY # A model repo, mounted read-only. /base-model: source: hf://Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B store: hf mode: MOUNT # A dataset repo, pinned to a revision, read-only. /data: source: hf://datasets/my-org/my-dataset@main store: hf mode: MOUNT That one hf:// scheme covers the whole lifecycle: read the model and dataset from their repos, write checkpoints to a Bucket while you train, publish the finished model back to a repo, and pull it onto inference servers when you serve. Most teams already keep their models and datasets on the Hub, so there is no migration step and no new storage account to create. MOUNT uses Hugging Face's hf-mount FUSE backend, so a bucket or repo shows up as a local path next to SkyPilot's other FUSE mounts (gcsfuse, blobfuse2, rclone, goofys). The fetching happens at the filesystem layer: when your code issues a read(), the driver pulls just those bytes from the Xet backend, so only the data you actually touch crosses the network, and hf-mount keeps an on-disk cache so repeat reads stay local. That on-disk cache is the behavior SkyPilot gives its other backends under MOUNT_CACHED, where a plain MOUNT instead streams every read from the bucket with nothing kept locally. For the hf store, MOUNT and MOUNT_CACHED behave the same, so either mode keeps the cache. Because reads are lazy, a process can start working through a large file before the whole file has downloaded, instead of blocking on a full copy first. That keeps the GPU busy almost immediately, training on data as it streams in rather than sitting idle (and billing) while a dataset or checkpoint copies down. It pays off most on the first epoch, when nothing is cached yet. COPY takes the other route and downloads through huggingface_hub up front, with no special requirements. Authentication is the token you already have. Set HF_TOKEN in your environment and hand it to a run with --secret HF_TOKEN; SkyPilot uses it for the mount on whatever cloud the job lands. One token works whether the job lands on AWS, GCP, Azure, Nebius, Lambda, or your own Kubernetes cluster, so there are no per-cloud bucket keys to juggle. No egress: storage stops deciding where you run GPU capacity rarely comes from one place anymore. To get enough H100s and H200s, teams hold reserved and committed capacity across several vendors at once (a block on a hyperscaler, a cluster on a neocloud, maybe an on-prem rack) and run wherever they have allocation. SkyPilot is built for this: one job spec, scheduled across 20+ clouds, Kubernetes, and on-prem, landing on whichever reserved cluster is free. Object storage has been the catch. Object stores are regional and per-cloud, so feeding a GPU or an inference server that sits in a different vendor's data center means either keeping a copy of your data in every vendor's bucket or paying to pull it across. Most clouds charge egress (around $0.09/GB out of AWS) the moment data leaves their network, and often between regions inside one cloud. Pulling a base model onto every inference node, or iterating a dataset for several epochs from a cluster on another cloud, adds a hefty bill on top of GPUs you have already reserved. Teams end up pinning each run to whichever vendor holds the data and leaving the rest of their capacity idle. Hugging Face Storage takes that cost off the table where it bites: the read side. With no egress or CDN fees and storage at $12-18/TB/month (versus AWS S3 at roughly $23/TB plus egress), the same bucket is reachable from every one of those clusters, and reading from it is free no matter where the GPUs run. Writing back still costs your compute cloud's usual egress, the same as it would to any off-cloud store, but for most AI work the reads dominate: a dataset streamed over many epochs, or model weights pulled onto every new training or inference node. So you stop pinning each run to whichever vendor holds a copy of the data. A quick benchmark To collect some benchmark numbers, we ran a small fine-tune: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B on the HuggingFaceH4/Multilingual-Thinking dataset with TRL's SFTTrainer, mounting the model read-only from its Hub repo and writing every checkpoint to a Hugging Face Bucket. The same SkyPilot YAML ran on AWS, GCP, and Lambda, changing only --infra. SkyPilot placed each job wherever GPUs were free, and all three read and wrote the same bucket. # qwen-sft.yaml. Launch anywhere: sky launch qwen-sft.yaml --infra aws|gcp|... resources: accelerators: H100:1 # or whatever the cloud has file_mounts: /base-model: source: hf://Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B # read-only, lazy-mounted from the Hub store: hf mode: MOUNT /checkpoints: source: hf://buckets/my-org/qwen-sft # read-write Bucket store: hf mode: MOUNT run: | python train.py --model /base-model --output_dir /checkpoints What we measured: The model loaded free on every cloud. Lazy reads pull only what from_pretrained touches, so it was ready to train in about 30 seconds (up to 500 MB/s). Because Hugging Face charges no egress, that pull cost nothing; had the model lived in S3, every read to a GPU on another cloud would have been billed egress ($0.09/GB on AWS). Checkpoints streamed straight to the bucket at up to ~170 MB/s (8.43 GB of weights each) and persisted past the GPU instance. Per cloud, checkpoints wrote to the bucket at: Cloud GPU Checkpoint write AWS (us-east-2) L40S ~168 MB/s GCP (us-central1) L4 ~123 MB/s Lambda (us-west-3) H100 ~112 MB/s Xet-backed storage: dedup for checkpoints and model variants Hugging Face Buckets are built on Xet, which uses content-defined chunking to split files into ~64 KB chunks and store each unique chunk once. Because the boundaries follow the content, an edit changes only the chunks it touches and the rest are recognized as already stored. This pays off in a few places: Incremental and adapter checkpoints. When you freeze layers, train adapters, or otherwise leave most weights untouched between saves, only the changed chunks upload instead of the whole checkpoint. Model variants that share a base. Fine-tunes and quantizations of one base model overlap heavily, so the shared chunks are stored once across all of them. Datasets you append to. Logs like conversation traces or inference outputs grow by appending rows to large Parquet files. The existing row groups stay byte-identical, so only the new rows transfer: in Hugging Face's test, appending 10K rows to a 100K-row table moved about 10 MB instead of the full ~106 MB. (If you edit or delete rows in place, write with use_content_defined_chunking=True to keep changes local.) Re-uploads skip what's already stored. In our test, re-uploading an 8.43 GB blob already in the bucket took about 8 seconds, versus 24 seconds for the first upload, because only chunk hashes move. The same mechanism lets server-side hf buckets cp between repos and buckets copy by reference instead of re-uploading bytes. How much you save depends on how much your artifacts overlap, but the deduplication is automatic: you write a checkpoint as usual, and only the new chunks leave the machine. Get started pip install "skypilot[huggingface]" hf auth login # or: export HF_TOKEN=<your-token> Add an hf:// mount to any SkyPilot task and launch. MOUNT needs a base image with glibc 2.34+ and /dev/fuse. Built together: Hugging Face and SkyPilot The initial store: hf support started as a contribution from Nikhil Jha. The Hugging Face team carried it forward and upstreamed the hf-mount FUSE fixes that let it mount in unprivileged containers, the default on many Kubernetes clusters. The SkyPilot team wired it into the storage backend. The whole path is open source: SkyPilot, Hugging Face's hf-mount, and the huggingface_hub client. Resources SkyPilot storage docs Hugging Face Storage Buckets guide hf-mount Xet: content-defined chunking and deduplication SkyPilot Slack community Models mentioned in this article 1 Datasets mentioned in this article 1 More Articles from our Blog partnershipsaudioopen-source-collab Hugging Face and Cerebras bring Gemma 4 to real-time voice AI 71 July 1, 2026 guideopen-source-collab We got local models to triage the OpenClaw repo for FREE!* 7 June 22, 2026 Community EditPreview Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here. Tap or paste here to upload images Comment · Sign up or log in to comment Upvote - Models mentioned in this article 1 Datasets mentioned in this article 1
Related
相關文章

AI產業全景透視之:3D NAND,以鉬代鎢
隨著AI應用持續推升記憶體需求,3D NAND Flash技術的演進也成為半導體產業關注焦點。近期業界討論的「以鉬代鎢」趨勢,正因高層堆疊技術的突破而加速落地,並帶動上游材料供應鏈出現結構性變化。 ### 從平面到立體:3D NAND用層數換密度 NAND Flash之所以得名,是因為其存儲單元的串聯結構在電路上等效於一個「與非閘」(Not AND)。傳統2D NAND是在單層平面上排列儲存單元,隨著製程微縮逼近物理極限,轉而朝垂直方向發展,形成3D NAND技術。

覆盤2021年新能源,AI走到哪個階段?
本文以2021年新能源車產業行情為借鏡,分析AI產業目前正處於上游材料漲價階段,類似當年新能源的供需錯配行情。文中指出AI行情與新能源傳導路徑相似,但AI需求更廣、產業鏈更長、供給壁壘更高,預估此輪漲價週期將持續至2027年。

OpenAI發佈GeneBench-Pro,在129個問題/10個領域內評估AI科研能力
OpenAI 發布 GeneBench-Pro 更新版,涵蓋基因組學、分子生物學等 10 個領域共 129 個問題,旨在評估 AI 在科學研究中的多階段統計推理能力。測試結果顯示,最強模型 GPT-5.6 Sol Pro 的通過率僅為 31.5%,整體表現仍偏低,顯示當前 AI 尚未能穩定完成完整的科學分析推理閉環。

馬斯克用了中國機器人,海外跑出一家國產“隱形冠軍”
賬號設置我的關注我的收藏申請的報道退出登錄登錄搜索36氪Auto數字時氪未來消費智能湧現未來城市啟動Power on36氪出海36氪研究院潮生TIDE36氪企服點評36氪財經職場bonus36碳後浪研究所暗湧Waves硬氪氪睿研究院媒體品牌企業號企服點評36Kr研究院36Kr創新諮詢企業服務核心服務城市之窗政府服務創投發佈LP源計劃VClubVClub投資機。

宇樹狂奔上市,真正的懸念是它拿了42億後要怎麼花
宇樹科技正加速上市,已成功募集42億元資金,引發市場對其資金運用策略的高度關注。外界普遍聚焦該公司是否會將資金投入技術研發、產能擴張或海外布局,這筆資金動向將成為觀察其未來發展的關鍵指標。

百億市場的AI遊戲,只是少數人的紅利
AI遊戲市場規模突破百億美元,然而真正能從中獲利的僅是掌握核心算力、數據與平台入口的少數大廠。多數中小開發者因技術門檻、高昂成本及用戶獲取困難,難以在快速迭代的市場中突圍。大者恆大與投資集中化的趨勢,讓絕大多數參與者只能面對資源被擠壓的現實。