英偉達極速小模型正式亮相

2026年8月12日 00:00
站內 AI 整理稿

Ad Skip to content Nvidia's open-weight Nemotron 3.5 Lightning prioritizes speed over maximum intelligence Matthias Bastian View the LinkedIn Profile of Matthias Bastian Aug 11, 2026 Nano Banana Pro prompted by THE DECODER Nvidia's new Nemotron 3.

5 Lightning is a compact open-weights model that matches OpenAI's gpt-oss-120b on intelligence benchmarks with a quarter of the parameters while delivering the fastest inference speeds in its class.Nvidia has released Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, the first model in its new Nemotron 3.5 lineup.

The model directly succeeds the Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and keeps its hybrid Mamba-Transformer architecture, with 31.6 billion total parameters and only 3.6 billion active at any given time.

According to the independent benchmarking platform Artificial Analysis, the model scores 24 on the Intelligence Index, a nine-point jump from its predecessor (15).

That puts Lightning on par with OpenAI's gpt-oss-120b (24) and just behind Nvidia's own Nemotron 3 Super (26), which is about four times larger.The smartest small models in the same size class, like Qwen3.6 35B A3B (32) and Meta's new Muse Glimmer (35), still hold a clear lead.Ad Nemotron 3.

5 Lightning scores 24 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, tying with gpt-oss-120b.| Image: Artificial Analysis Nvidia is targeting a different spot on the efficiency frontier with Lightning.

In pre-release tests using the final NVFP4 weights, the model hits nearly 670 tokens per second, the highest measured throughput among all compared models and almost twice as fast as Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (386 tokens/s).A task from the Intelligence Index takes about 0.

5 minutes to complete, while Qwen3.6 35B A3B needs around 3.5 minutes, and Gemma 4 31B takes roughly 5.8 minutes.AdDECDIncontent-1 At 669 tokens per second, Lightning is the fastest model in the comparison.

Despite generating a similar number of tokens per task as its predecessor Nemotron 3 Nano, it delivers much better results.| Image: Artificial Analysis Proprietary models still dominate the overall efficiency frontier.Gemini 3.

5 Flash-Lite scores 37 on the Intelligence Index with a similar time per task, and GPT-5.6 Luna (max) reaches 52 points in under two minutes.Agentic benchmarks show the biggest gains The biggest improvements show up in agentic benchmarks, according to Artificial Analysis.

On GDPval-AA v2, Lightning reaches an Elo rating of 824, a 334-point gain over Nemotron 3 Nano.That beats both gpt-oss-120b (800) and the larger Nemotron 3 Super (698).On Terminal-Bench v2.1, the score jumps from 7 to 24.3 percent, nearly matching gpt-oss-120b at 26.2 percent.

Ad On agentic benchmarks, Lightning surpasses both gpt-oss-120b and the larger Nemotron 3 Super with an Elo rating of 824.| Image: Artificial Analysis Nvidia ships the model under the permissive OpenMDW-1.1 license, positioning it as a high-throughput workhorse for agent-based pipelines.

Artificial Analysis reports that Nvidia worked with partners like CodeRabbit and Harvey on post-training to boost performance in specific domains.Availability Nvidia provides the model in both BF16 and NVFP4 weights.

The NVFP4 variant also scores 24 on the Intelligence Index with minimal quality loss compared to the higher-precision version, according to Artificial Analysis.The reasoning model handles text only and supports a context window of one million tokens.

Weights are available now, and serverless inference is offered by DeepInfra, Fireworks, FriendliAI, CoreWeave, GMI Cloud, Nebius, and Crusoe, among others.AdDECDIncontent-2 Nvidia's push for efficiency over size isn't new.

In a widely discussed paper last year, its researchers argued that models under 10 billion parameters can handle most agent workloads as well as 70- to 175-billion-parameter models at one-tenth to one-thirtieth the cost.Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 31.6 billion parameters but activates only 3.

6 billion per step, putting it in the same lightweight class.At nearly 670 tokens per second, it also beats gpt-oss-120b and the larger Nemotron 3 Super on agentic benchmarks, making it the clearest product-level proof of that thesis yet.

Ad AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

Subscribe now Source: Nvidia | Artificial Analysis | Hugging Face BETA-TEST × wpDiscuzInsert BETA-TEST × wpDiscuzInsert

Related

相關文章

IT之家模型更新

消息稱字節整合 AI 生產力:TRAE、釦子併入豆包,將推統一辦公品牌“豆包工作”

作者:沁滄(實習) 責編:沁滄 評論: 感謝網友 HH_KK 的線索投遞!8 月 24 日消息,據智能湧現消息,字節跳動對旗下的辦公 AI 產品完成了一輪團隊整合:TRAE、釦子(Coze)團隊將整體併入豆包體系,其中 TRAE Work、釦子將與豆包在工作場景的產品能力進行整合;TRAE IDE 及 CLI 將作為豆包品牌下的編程產品線持續發展。

剛剛
鈦媒體模型更新

DeepSeek Harness來了:AI開始製造AI了?

DeepSeek Harness 正式推出,這項新工具被視為 AI 發展的重要里程碑,可能讓 AI 系統具備自主開發或優化其他 AI 的能力。外界關注此技術是否象徵 AI 開始「製造」AI,並可能加速人工智慧的進化與應用。目前相關細節與實際影響仍待進一步觀察。

剛剛
鈦媒體模型更新

AI辦公助手,沒有葵花寶典:五款應用萬字實測報告

AGI-Signal2026.08.24 09:12 · 來自北京全文11936字單項冠軍各有其人。2026年上半年,AI辦公賽道發生了一個根本性變化,工具不再滿足於當“對話框”,而是試圖接管完整任務,寫一段文案、做完一份報告、生成一份PPT,甚至跨應用操作。

37 分鐘前

字節整合AI辦公產品,TRAE、釦子團隊併入豆包

其中,TRAE Work、釦子將與豆包的工作場景產品能力整合;TRAE IDE及CLI則作為豆包品牌下的編程產品線繼續發展。調整後,相關產品和運營團隊統一向豆包產品負責人趙祺彙報。(iFeng Tech)TRAE與釦子此前均隸屬於字節跳動產品研發和工程架構部,前者最初定位AI編程產品,後者則聚焦AI智能體開發平臺,並持續探索不同Agent方向。

44 分鐘前6100