救世主出世!270億參數的「Saluki 27B」8-bit壓縮模型,妥坐7.89GB,遠勝原始版本於工具調用能力

2026年10月9日 07:23
站內 AI 整理稿

Underdog, the on-device assistant from Conway Research, has released Saluki 27B under Apache 2.0.Underdog Saluki 27B is a 2-bit GGUF of Qwen3.8-27B that fits in 7.89 GB.The full BF16 model needs 54 GB.

Underdog tuned the compression to protect tool calling, the skill that turns a chat model into an agent.For developers, that means a 27B-class agent model that runs in stock llama.cpp.TL;DR Size: 27B dense parameters.7.89 GB GGUF versus 54 GB for BF16.Runs on: stock llama.

cpp and apps built on it, with full GPU offload.Optional 629 MB or 928 MB vision add-on.Performance: 96% average retention across 9 benchmarks versus full Qwen3.8-27B.Best: Parallel tool calls, 42 versus 35 for the full model (120% retention).Worst: AIME 2025, 79.2 versus 96.7 (about 82% retention).

Bottom line: Best: beats the 54 GB original at tool calling in a sub-8 GB file.Worst: competition math and multi-step reasoning drop 12 to 18 points.What is Underdog Saluki 27B?Saluki 27B is a 2-bit, mixed-precision GGUF of Qwen3.8-27B built for local agents.

It stacks 3 layers of work: The base is Qwen3.8-27B, a dense 27B model from the Qwen team.It has 64 layers, mixes Gated DeltaNet linear attention with gated attention, and supports 262,144 tokens natively.The second layer is ISTA-DASLab’s Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF.

GSQ learns accurate low-bit scalar grids per tensor.RCO assigns a quantization type to each tensor under a fixed size budget.ISTA’s smallest file, IQ2XS, is 8.4 GB at 2.50 bits per weight.The third layer is Underdog’s own pass.It shrank the file to 7.89 GB and targeted tool calling.

The file is named IQ2-mix and carries an imatrix tag.Underdog has not published the full recipe for this pass.How does Saluki perform on benchmarks?Underdog splits its results into 2 groups.

The first group ran both models in the same harness: Underdog Bench: 120 tasks from BFCL v4, frozen before testing.Thinking off, temperature 0.Saluki scores 88, the full model 84, and PrismML’s Bonsai 2 scores 70.Parallel tool calls: 100 BFCL v4 parallel tasks with the official checker.

Saluki 42, full model 35.SWE-bench Verified: 50 issues.Saluki fixes 30, the full model 33.The second group compares Saluki with public full-size scores: BenchmarkSaluki 27BQwen3.8-27B (public)IFEval (prompt-loose)93.591.5IFBench (prompt-loose)72.771.0MBPP+78.083.9MuSR67.579.6AIME 2025 (avg@4)79.296.

7AIME 2026 (avg@4)80.094.6 window.addEventListener("message",function(e){var f=document.getElementById("mtp-saluki-frame");if(f&&e.source===f.contentWindow&&e.data&&e.data.mtpH){f.style.height=e.data.mtpH+"px";}}); How does Saluki compare with other compact Qwen3.8-27B builds?

FeatureUnderdog Saluki 27BQwen3.8-27B (BF16)ISTA GSQ-RCO IQ2XSPrismML Bonsai 2 27B (PTQ1_0)OrgUnderdog (Conway Research)Qwen teamISTA-DASLabPrismMLParameters27B27B27B27.36BFile size7.89 GB54 GB8.4 GB5.95 GBBits per weightNot disclosed (2-bit mix)162.501.

75ContextNot disclosed262,144 nativeNot disclosed262KVisionAdd-on, 629 or 928 MBNative0.9 GB mmprojOptional 0.63 GBRuntimeStock llama.cppTransformers, vLLM, SGLangStock llama.cpp, Ollama, LM StudioPrismML llama.

cpp forkUnderdog Bench (of 120)8884Not disclosed70Vendor headline96% avg retention, 9 benchmarksBaseline100.3% zero-shot recovery98.2% of FP16, 14 benchmarksLicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0Apache 2.0Apache 2.0 Bonsai 2 is smaller and reports 98.2% retention across 14 thinking-mode benchmarks.

It also posts stronger math, including 95.00 on AIME25.However, it needs PrismML’s llama.cpp fork, since stock llama.cpp rejects its packing formats.Saluki runs on stock llama.cpp.Each vendor uses its own harness, so cross-vendor scores are not directly comparable.

Key Takeaways Saluki 27B fits Qwen3.8-27B into 7.89 GB, down from 54 GB.It beats the full model on tool calling: 88 versus 84.Parallel tool calls rise to 42 from 35.Math and reasoning take the biggest hit, down to about 82 to 85%.It runs in stock llama.cpp under Apache 2.0.

Check out the Model Card on Hugging Face, the Underdog launch page and the announcement on X.All credit goes to the researcher of this project.Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?

now you can join us on telegram as well.The post Meet the Underdog Saluki 27B: A 2-bit Qwen3.8-27B That Beats the Original at Tool Calling appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Related

相關文章

MarkTechPost AI模型更新

Google 開源 Harness²:遞迴代理程式框架,無需新模型也能提升效能

Google Cloud AI Research 開源了 Harness²,這是一個遞迴代理程式框架,透過改良凍結模型周圍的程式碼與檔案來增強效能。對開發者而言,重點很簡單:你的代理程式無需更強大的模型也能進步。重點摘要:規模為框架而非模型,訓練參數為0,包含8個可編輯的框架元件,版本0.1.0。執行環境為Linux、Python 3.12或3.13搭配uv,模型呼叫則透過Vertex AI。GPU需求未公開。效能方面:一次改良步驟即可在3個基準測試中,提升所有4個模型與框架組合的表現。最佳成果:GLM-5搭配OpenCode在WorkBuddy-Bench上從64.2提升至75.7(+11.5點);最差表現:GLM-5搭配Codex在JobBench上僅提升1.2點(23.6至24.8)。什麼是Harness²?它是Google研究推出的即插即用框架。

15 小時前
MarkTechPost AI模型更新

認識 Kyutai REKI:2.4B VLA 模型為機器人操控帶來高效記憶

Kyutai 與 Inria 及 École des Ponts 合作,推出了 REKI——一個用於機器人操控的 2.4B 參數視覺-語言-動作模型(VLA)。該模型僅使用公開數據進行預訓練,並配備了輕量級的近期記憶功能。在三個分佈外基準測試中,僅有規模約為其兩倍的模型能超越它。所有模型權重已於今日在 Hugging Face 上公開。核心資訊:規模:2.4B 參數(2.2B Qwen3.5-2B VLM + 0.2B 流匹配動作專家)。記憶涵蓋最近 3 幀,間隔 1 秒。運行環境:在 1 張 NVIDIA H100 上進行基準測試。從兩個 256×256 攝像頭輸入,編譯後每個動作區塊耗時 21.8 毫秒。權重以 BF16 格式提供,暫無量化版本。性能:在 LIBERO-Plus 和 RoboTwin Clean2Rand 基準測試中,為公開數據預訓練的 VLA 模型中最優;在 LIBERO-Plus 上達到 90.4% 的最高分。

1 天前
MarkTechPost AI模型更新

DeepSeek 發布 V4.1-Flash-1017,DeepSWE 得分 77.0,並開放搜尋 API

DeepSeek 剛發布 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017,這是其 V4.1-Flash 模型的新檢查點,現已在 DeepSeek 網站、應用程式及 API 上線。DeepSeek 宣稱該版本在性能、任務完成速度與輸出簡潔度上均優於 9 月發布的 V4.1-Flash,並稱之為性能與成本的帕累託改進。同時,DeepSeek 也向所有開發者開放了搜尋與擷取 API。對代理建構者而言,這意味著更便宜的編碼模型加上單一 API 金鑰即可使用的第一方網路層。重點摘要:骨架參數 552B,另加 196B 的 Engram 參數;預填充階段每 token 啟用 8B 參數,解碼階段啟用 16B 參數;上下文長度達 1M tokens,最大輸出 384K tokens。運行於 DeepSeek API 的 deepseek-flash 模型。9 月版的 V4.1-Flash 權重(763B 參數,FP8)採 MIT 授權。

1 天前
MarkTechPost AI模型更新

2026年20款Jev替代方案:挑戰TypeSafe的決策模型

TypeSafe於2026年9月15日推出Jev,這是一款決策模型而非聊天機器人。使用者可定義允許的答案,Jev將回傳標籤、分數或是否的機率。約4週內,至少20款Jev替代方案相繼問世,來自Cloudflare、OpenAI、Perplexity、Liquid AI、AWS的Strands Labs及獨立開發者。本指南比較各方案在規模、授權、硬體、價格、Jev API相容性及已發布基準測試的表現。重點摘要:規模範圍從287M(GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide)到35B-A3B(Mapika Decider),Jev規模未公開。執行環境:Von和Laya等編碼器可在CPU上運行,4B適配器適用24 GB GPU或32 GB Mac。效能:多數開源模型在困難推理上落後Jev,但在狹窄分類任務上數款與之匹敵或超越。最佳表現:Cloudflare Clef在BANKING7取得94.20分。

1 天前
雷峰網模型更新

長鑫科技市值兩月內跌去1萬億;阿里加碼AI硬件品牌,天貓、速賣通聯動;國行版蘋果AI有望12月上線,百度、阿里參與合作丨雷峰早報

要聞提示1.長鑫科技市值兩月內跌去1萬億2.年內已至少18次故障!DeepSeek發放宕機補償,有人拿到3000元3.阿里加碼AI硬件品牌,天貓、速賣通聯動4.國行版蘋果AI有望12月上線,百度、阿里參與合作5.可靈AI新一代模型Kling 4.

2 天前