OpenClaw 發布 OpenClaw 2.0:引導式模型設定、575 毫秒控制介面啟動,每個閘道單一信任邊界
The OpenClaw team has just released OpenClaw 2.0.The team shipped nothing for nearly seven weeks, after 106 releases in the previous 230 days.The update rewrites installation and rebuilds the browser Control UI.It also moves sessions and transcripts into SQLite and adds shared cloud sessions.
Is it deployable?Yes for single-operator and single-team deployments.No for multi-tenant products.Setup starts from credentials you already have Guided setup now looks for AI access already on the machine.
It can reuse verified Codex, ChatGPT or Claude CLI sign-ins, accept an API key, run a provider sign-in, or find installed Ollama and LM Studio models.It then proves the exact choice can answer before saving that model and credential.Fresh OpenAI setups default to GPT-5.6.
On the local side, node-llama-cpp was replaced with a managed llama-server, Gemma 4 became the RAM-gated llama.cpp default, and the llama.cpp default context was raised to 64K.
The browser app is now the primary surface The rebuilt Control UI puts conversations at the center, with files, approvals and live work beside the chat.In a simulated default-chat test with a mocked Gateway and 50 ms HTTP/1.
1 latency, JavaScript requests fell from 140 to 45 and startup fell from roughly 1.6 seconds to 575 ms.
Docked panels add a workspace file editor, a git-backed Changes panel with pull-request status and CI summaries, a browser panel with element inspection and screenshot annotation, and a full-screen web terminal.
The limits are stated plainly: the file editor cannot create or delete files, Changes is read-only, and Create PR hands off to GitHub rather than submitting inside OpenClaw.Approval requests appear inside the conversation that triggered them, with a rolling 30-day history.
A /btw command opens a side conversation so a quick question does not pollute the main transcript.Storage moved to SQLite, and downgrades are not free Sessions and transcripts now live in SQLite.
Before rolling back to an older file-backed release, the current CLI must restore archived legacy transcript artifacts, and sessions created after the migration will not appear in older releases.Take a verified backup before upgrading.
Multiplayer, with an explicit ceiling Shared cloud sessions let a second person join live work or take it over with context intact.Owners and administrators choose whether someone may read, suggest changes, work in a draft, or participate directly.
The documentation is direct about the ceiling: these controls are not tenant isolation and not a security boundary.Incognito is off by default, keeps its conversation in process memory, and still sends messages to the model provider.
Security posture to review before rollout The Gateway binds to loopback by default, and most chat channels answer an unknown DM sender with a pairing code.openclaw security audit checks inbound access, tool blast radius, network exposure, browser control exposure and plugin allowlists.
Model choice is treated as the first mitigation for prompt injection.OpenClaw cites a 2026 crowdsourced arena of 272K attacks across 41 agent scenarios, scored only when the agent both executed the harmful action and hid it from the user: 0.5% success against Claude Opus 4.5, 1.0% against Sonnet 4.
5, 1.3% against Haiku 4.5, and 8.5% against Gemini 2.5 Pro.The same page warns that adaptive human attackers still exceed 80% success against state-of-the-art defenses, so tool policy, exec approvals and sandboxing remain the hard enforcement layer.
Interactive explainer (function(){ var f = document.getElementById('mtp-openclaw2-frame'); window.addEventListener('message', function(e){ if(!e.data) return; var h = e.data.ocEmbedHeight || e.data.height; if(typeof h === 'number' && h > 200 && h < 4000) f.style.
height = h + 'px'; }); })(); #mtp-openclaw2-explainer hr, #mtp-openclaw2-explainer p:empty, #mtp-openclaw2-explainer del, #mtp-openclaw2-explainer s { display:none !important; } #mtp-openclaw2-explainer { background:transparent !important; margin:24px 0 !
important; } @media (max-width:640px) { #mtp-openclaw2-frame { height:1100px; } } Key Takeaways v2026.8.1 lands 16,000+ PRs from 933 contributors, about half of OpenClaw's total merge history.Guided setup reuses existing subscriptions, API keys and local models, and verifies the model before saving.
Rebuilt Control UI cut test-harness startup from ~1.6 s to 575 ms and JS requests from 140 to 45.Shared cloud sessions add real multiplayer, but the docs say they are not a security boundary.Check out the release notes and OpenClaw 2.0 Technical details.
Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.?
Connect with us The post OpenClaw Releases OpenClaw 2.0: Guided Model Setup, 575 ms Control UI Startup, and One Trust Boundary Per Gateway appeared first on MarkTechPost.
Related
相關文章

「GPT-6」灰測demo刷屏!週四發佈在即
OpenAI傳聞中的旗艦模型「Astra」疑似即為GPT-6,近期流出內部測試demo,展示驚人的3D資產生成能力,包含可演奏的鋼琴與細節完整的城堡,社群反應熱烈,但官方尚未證實。該模型原定8月推出,因安全疑慮而延期,如今傳出最快將於本週四(9月3日)正式發布。

騰訊混元:Hy4 preview 調用激增,WorkBuddy 已緊急擴容
作者:浩渺 責編:浩渺 評論: 感謝網友 不一樣的體驗、files、麻辣清補涼 的線索投遞!8 月 31 日消息,騰訊混元今日發文稱,自 2026 年 8 月 28 日混元 Hy4 preview 在 WorkBuddy 首發接入以來,憑藉其 Agent 能力的顯著提升,受到了廣大用戶與開發者的積極體驗和熱情反饋,上線首日即在 WorkBuddy 任務隊列中出現排隊情況,對此深表歉意。

首例AI自主黑客攻擊曝光,Claude失控,德州大學生一人抓包
新智元·2026年08月31日 11:52大學生截獲失控AI的開源項目惡意攻擊 被拒了20多次實習後,24歲Sinan Can Demir決定去GitHub上攢點項目經驗。他怎麼也沒想到,自己撞上的第一條「大魚」,竟然是一個失控的AI。

上線一月,Seedance 2.5能否抗住“平替”圍攻?
Tech星球2026.08.31 11:24 · 來自北京全文3579字00:00 / 10:35平替扎堆來襲,Seedance 正在遭遇什麼? 文 | Tech星球,作者 | 翟元元字節跳動旗下視頻生成大模型Seedance 2.5上線近一個月,用戶對它的評價呈兩極分化:一種聲音認為它價格太貴,生成一段十幾秒的視頻最後需要幾十塊,對個人創作者而言門檻過高,貴是原罪。另一種聲音則認為,它是地表最強視頻生成模型,生成效果最好,暫時無人超越,貴但好用。即便眼下Seedance 2.

AIGC,闖進長片片場
生成式AI的創作能量已從短影音延伸至長片電影製作,實際參與前製概念圖、動態分鏡到後期特效等環節,象徵其角色從輔助工具轉為能主導風格與敘事節奏的創作夥伴。不過進入長片也面臨人物一致性、跨場景細節誤差與複雜多人互動等技術門檻,導演與剪接師須在AI的創意生成與精準敘事間取得平衡。此外,AIGC正重塑影視產業的勞動分工與成本結構,雖為獨立製片開啟新可能,也迫使從業人員重新定位價值,以原創性與手工感作為區隔平庸與傑作的關鍵。
