Microsoft AI Releases Microsoft-Decision-1: A Qwen3.5-9B Decision-Scoring Model

2026年10月10日 06:03
站內 AI 整理稿

Microsoft has released Microsoft-Decision-1, a decision model for routing, classification, verification and agent control.Microsoft-Decision-1 is a decision-scoring model that returns a calibrated probability for each fixed answer option instead of generated text.

It is post-trained from Alibaba’s Qwen3.5-9B and available now in Microsoft Foundry and OpenRouter..TL;DR Size: Built on Qwen3.5-9B; exact parameter count not disclosed.32,768-token context window.Runs on: Hosted API only (Microsoft Foundry, OpenRouter via Azure).

No open weights, no quantized variants, hardware not disclosed.Performance: Highest average accuracy in Microsoft’s 36-benchmark comparison, at 85 ms p50 latency.Best: 83.5% average accuracy across 36 benchmarks, ahead of Quyet-1.0-Large at 81.9%.Worst: Calibration of 92.2, second to Quyet-1.

0-Large at 93.1.Text-only, no explanations.Bottom line: Best thing: fast, cheap, calibrated decisions at $0.042 per million input tokens with free output.Worst thing: closed weights, and every benchmark is vendor-run.What is a decision model?

A decision model reads an input and scores a closed set of options.It does not write prose.Microsoft frames decision models as a new AI category, built for outputs software can act on immediately.How does Microsoft-Decision-1 work?Microsoft post-trained Qwen3.5-9B for single-pass decision scoring.

Given a situation, a question and fixed options, it returns a probability per option in one call.It plans to rebase future versions on MAI and OpenAI models.

The Foundry model card lists the supported formats: yes/no, multiple-choice, rating, classification and rubric questions grading of AI responses and proposed agent actions groundedness checks against supplied evidence explicit abstention options such as “cannot tell” Training used public datasets under Microsoft’s Open Data process plus synthetic data.

Output is JSON.OpenRouter notes that weights update continually while the API shape stays fixed.How fast and accurate is it?Microsoft compared 9 systems across 36 benchmarks with 147,137 questions.Benchmarks were kept blind from training.Microsoft-Decision-1 led on average accuracy at 83.5%.

Its p50 latency was 85 ms, with p95 at 125 ms.That is 4.5 times quicker than Quyet-1.0-Large and 35 times quicker than GPT-6 Sol, which took 3.01 s.#md1x-wrap hr,#md1x-wrap p:empty,#md1x-wrap del,#md1x-wrap s{display:none!important}#md1x-wrap iframe{width:100%!important;border:0!

important;background:transparent!important;display:block} window.addEventListener("message",function(e){if(e.data&&e.data.type==="md1x-height"){var f=document.getElementById("md1x-frame");if(f&&e.source===f.contentWindow){f.style.height=e.data.height+"px";}}}); Microsoft also tested robustness.

It perturbs each request 8 ways, including paraphrasing and option shuffling.The model flipped its decision on 1.3% of perturbations on average.Flips were zero when options were paraphrased, reversed or shuffled.On safety, Microsoft ran 5,250 requests across 11 benchmarks.

These covered harmful content, jailbreaks and prompt injection.Microsoft reports correct refusals with high retained utility, without publishing a score.Internal results Microsoft reports Xbox Research: sorted 10,000+ feedback items, 14 times faster and 200 times cheaper than GPT-6 Sol.

Copilot quality control: competitive with GPT5.6 Luna and 100 times faster.Microsoft Discovery: 46 times more consistent than LLM scoring, at 3 times the speed.How does it compare with other decision models?FeatureMicrosoft-Decision-1Quyet-1.

0-LargeH2O-Lightning-4BGPT-6 Luna DecisionsDeveloperMicrosoftChinh NguyenH2O.aiOpenAIBase modelQwen3.5-9BGemma-4-31B-it (LoRA merged)Qwen3.5-4BNot disclosedParametersNot disclosed31.

3B4BNot disclosedContext / input32,768 tokens8,000-token prompt (6,000 state)40,960 (vLLM serve setting)Not disclosedLicenseProprietary APIApache-2.0Apache-2.0Proprietary APIModalityTextTextText and imagesText and imagesHardwareHosted (Azure)1x 80 GB GPU, bf1632 GB GPU tested; 9.

1 GB weightsHostedAccuracy (Microsoft, 36 benchmarks)83.5%81.9%77.2%79.4%Calibration (Microsoft)92.293.191.889.9Median latency in Microsoft chart85 ms380 ms210 ms300 msPrice$0.042/M input, output freeSelf-hostSelf-host$0.

10/M input, output free Accuracy, calibration and latency rows come from Microsoft’s chart.Competitor latencies there use the JevBench v1.6.1 adjusted median.Is the latency comparison apples to apples?Not fully.Microsoft measured its own model through Foundry.

Competitor figures use JevBench’s adjusted median, not raw timings.H2O.ai’s model card disputes this.It states that JevBench’s adjusted figure doubles measured time and adds 0.15 s.H2O says its model’s measured median is 29 ms, not 210 ms.Microsoft-Decision-1 does not appear on the JevBench board.

On that board’s official composite, H2O-Lightning-4B ranks #1 at 72.5.How do developers deploy it?Developers can call it from Microsoft Foundry as a generally available ‘Direct from Azure’ model.On OpenRouter, it runs on the Decisions API, not the chat endpoint.Chat completions SDKs will not work.

Pricing is $0.042 per million input tokens, with free output.OpenAI’s Luna decisions endpoint charges $0.10 per million input tokens.What are the limitations?The model card is explicit: Not for text generation, open-ended Q&A, chat, translation or summarization.Text-only.No images, audio or video.

No explanations or rationales in the output.Not for sole automated decisions on credit, employment, housing, healthcare or legal rights.Applications must define options, thresholds, escalation paths and human oversight.

Key Takeaways Microsoft-Decision-1 scores fixed options with calibrated probabilities, not text.Post-trained from Qwen3.5-9B, with a 32,768-token context window.Leads Microsoft’s 36-benchmark comparison at 83.5% accuracy and 85 ms p50.Costs $0.042 per million input tokens; output tokens are free.

Latency comparisons are disputed; independent JevBench results are pending.Check out the official announcement, the Foundry model card and the OpenRouter listing.All credit goes to the researcher of this project.

Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.The post Microsoft AI Releases Microsoft-Decision-1: A Qwen3.

5-9B Decision-Scoring Model appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Related

相關文章

MarkTechPost AI模型更新

Google 開源 Harness²:遞迴代理程式框架,無需新模型也能提升效能

Google Cloud AI Research 開源了 Harness²,這是一個遞迴代理程式框架,透過改良凍結模型周圍的程式碼與檔案來增強效能。對開發者而言,重點很簡單:你的代理程式無需更強大的模型也能進步。重點摘要:規模為框架而非模型,訓練參數為0,包含8個可編輯的框架元件,版本0.1.0。執行環境為Linux、Python 3.12或3.13搭配uv,模型呼叫則透過Vertex AI。GPU需求未公開。效能方面:一次改良步驟即可在3個基準測試中,提升所有4個模型與框架組合的表現。最佳成果:GLM-5搭配OpenCode在WorkBuddy-Bench上從64.2提升至75.7(+11.5點);最差表現:GLM-5搭配Codex在JobBench上僅提升1.2點(23.6至24.8)。什麼是Harness²?它是Google研究推出的即插即用框架。

14 小時前
MarkTechPost AI模型更新

認識 Kyutai REKI:2.4B VLA 模型為機器人操控帶來高效記憶

Kyutai 與 Inria 及 École des Ponts 合作,推出了 REKI——一個用於機器人操控的 2.4B 參數視覺-語言-動作模型(VLA)。該模型僅使用公開數據進行預訓練,並配備了輕量級的近期記憶功能。在三個分佈外基準測試中,僅有規模約為其兩倍的模型能超越它。所有模型權重已於今日在 Hugging Face 上公開。核心資訊:規模:2.4B 參數(2.2B Qwen3.5-2B VLM + 0.2B 流匹配動作專家)。記憶涵蓋最近 3 幀,間隔 1 秒。運行環境:在 1 張 NVIDIA H100 上進行基準測試。從兩個 256×256 攝像頭輸入,編譯後每個動作區塊耗時 21.8 毫秒。權重以 BF16 格式提供,暫無量化版本。性能:在 LIBERO-Plus 和 RoboTwin Clean2Rand 基準測試中,為公開數據預訓練的 VLA 模型中最優;在 LIBERO-Plus 上達到 90.4% 的最高分。

1 天前
MarkTechPost AI模型更新

DeepSeek 發布 V4.1-Flash-1017,DeepSWE 得分 77.0,並開放搜尋 API

DeepSeek 剛發布 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017,這是其 V4.1-Flash 模型的新檢查點,現已在 DeepSeek 網站、應用程式及 API 上線。DeepSeek 宣稱該版本在性能、任務完成速度與輸出簡潔度上均優於 9 月發布的 V4.1-Flash,並稱之為性能與成本的帕累託改進。同時,DeepSeek 也向所有開發者開放了搜尋與擷取 API。對代理建構者而言,這意味著更便宜的編碼模型加上單一 API 金鑰即可使用的第一方網路層。重點摘要:骨架參數 552B,另加 196B 的 Engram 參數;預填充階段每 token 啟用 8B 參數,解碼階段啟用 16B 參數;上下文長度達 1M tokens,最大輸出 384K tokens。運行於 DeepSeek API 的 deepseek-flash 模型。9 月版的 V4.1-Flash 權重(763B 參數,FP8)採 MIT 授權。

1 天前
MarkTechPost AI模型更新

2026年20款Jev替代方案:挑戰TypeSafe的決策模型

TypeSafe於2026年9月15日推出Jev,這是一款決策模型而非聊天機器人。使用者可定義允許的答案,Jev將回傳標籤、分數或是否的機率。約4週內,至少20款Jev替代方案相繼問世,來自Cloudflare、OpenAI、Perplexity、Liquid AI、AWS的Strands Labs及獨立開發者。本指南比較各方案在規模、授權、硬體、價格、Jev API相容性及已發布基準測試的表現。重點摘要:規模範圍從287M(GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide)到35B-A3B(Mapika Decider),Jev規模未公開。執行環境:Von和Laya等編碼器可在CPU上運行,4B適配器適用24 GB GPU或32 GB Mac。效能:多數開源模型在困難推理上落後Jev,但在狹窄分類任務上數款與之匹敵或超越。最佳表現:Cloudflare Clef在BANKING7取得94.20分。

1 天前
雷峰網模型更新

長鑫科技市值兩月內跌去1萬億;阿里加碼AI硬件品牌,天貓、速賣通聯動;國行版蘋果AI有望12月上線,百度、阿里參與合作丨雷峰早報

要聞提示1.長鑫科技市值兩月內跌去1萬億2.年內已至少18次故障!DeepSeek發放宕機補償,有人拿到3000元3.阿里加碼AI硬件品牌,天貓、速賣通聯動4.國行版蘋果AI有望12月上線,百度、阿里參與合作5.可靈AI新一代模型Kling 4.

2 天前