Liquid AI Open-Sources Pipette: A Reproducible Benchmarking Suite That Measures On-Device Models, Quantization, Runtime and Hardware Together
Model cards report quality under server-class, full-precision conditions.Those numbers rarely predict how the same model behaves on a phone.This week, Liquid AI released Pipette.
It is an open-source platform for benchmarking foundation models on edge devices, built in partnership with Artificial Analysis as an independent methodology validator.Pipette treats on-device behavior as a property of the deployed system, not the model in isolation.
Its unit of measurement is a full configuration: model + quantization + runtime + device.The launch dataset covers five on-device performance metrics across more than 1,000 model × quantization × runtime × device × context configurations, spanning 30+ models, llama.
cpp builds for macOS, iOS, Windows and Android, and context lengths from 256 to 8,192 tokens.Initial verified results come from a MacBook Pro with M5 Max, an iPhone 17 Pro and a Galaxy S26 Ultra.The practical claim is testable: two 350M models at the same quantization on the same phone retain 78.
4% and 33.8% of decode throughput at 4,096 tokens.Is it deployable?Yes, Pipette ships as Apache 2.0 infrastructure (pipette-mgmt, pipette-clients, pipette-scores), a public results dataset, a hosted dashboard, and native iOS and Android benchmark apps.Nothing is waitlisted.
Publication of community-submitted results is still in beta.Which companies: Any team shipping a model onto hardware it does not own.Solo developers and seed-stage startups can use the dashboard and apps without infrastructure.
Mid-market product teams can run the clients across an internal device fleet.Large OEMs, chip vendors and enterprises can operate the whole pipeline behind their own firewall.
Industries: Consumer electronics and smartphone OEMs, automotive, industrial and robotics, healthcare devices, financial services, defense — anywhere latency, privacy or connectivity forces inference onto the device.
Applications: Model and quantization selection before a sprint commits; SoC and hardware procurement validation; regression testing when a runtime, OS or driver updates; context-length capacity planning; independent verification of vendor performance claims.
What Liquid AI shipped Liquid AI released Pipette in partnership with Artificial Analysis, an independent validator that reviewed and verified the methodology.The premise is narrow and useful: on-device behavior is a property of the deployed system, not of the model in isolation.
The launch dataset covers five on-device performance metrics across more than 1,000 model × quantization × runtime × device × context configurations.It spans 30+ models, multiple quantization formats, llama.cpp builds for macOS, iOS, Windows and Android, and context lengths from 256 to 8,192 tokens.
Initial published results come from a MacBook Pro with M5 Max, an iPhone 17 Pro and a Galaxy S26 Ultra, with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Radeon 8060S results listed as coming soon.In Pipette, the unit of measurement is a deployment configuration: model + quantization + runtime + device.
A benchmark then defines the metric and token shape, producing a latency, throughput or memory result.Quality is tracked separately on IFBench, GPQA Diamond and MATH-500.Those quality scores currently come from llama.
cpp evaluation runs on NVIDIA H100 80GB reference systems, then get matched to on-device runs sharing the same model and quantization — a quality number shown next to phone throughput was not produced on the phone.
Why the deployment context changes the answer Four published comparisons show how far a configuration can move a decision: Context scaling can diverge at identical parameter counts.At Q4KM on Galaxy S26 Ultra, Granite-4.0-H-350M retains 78.
4% of its decode throughput from 256 to 4,096 input tokens, while Granite-4.0-350M retains only 33.8%.Sparse activation buys speed, not memory.At 2,048 input tokens on the same phone, LFM2.5-8B-A1B decodes 2.4x faster than Qwen3.5-4B and 2.6x faster than Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512.It activates 1.
5B of 8.5B parameters per token, yet still peaks at 5.29 GiB because all expert weights occupy memory.Speed and quality do not co-locate.On iPhone 17 Pro at Q4KM, MiniCPM5-1B completes a 2,048-in / 256-out workload in 3.47 seconds versus 4.12 seconds for LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct, a 15.
8% reduction in elapsed time.On the same artifacts, LFM scores 9.0 points higher on MATH-500.Near-identical system profiles can hide task-level reversals.At Q4KM and 2,048 input tokens on M5 Max, Granite-4.1-8B and Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-2512 differ by 2.4% in decode throughput and 1.
2% in peak RAM.Granite leads IFBench by 7.3 points; Ministral leads GPQA Diamond by 14.0 points.How the measurements are produced Performance runs follow a published methodology: fixed token shapes, greedy decoding, a discarded warm-up, five measured repetitions and readiness gating.
Before each timed repetition, a platform-specific check verifies thermal and load conditions; failing runs are not published.Evaluations use a separate protocol with deterministic, model-blind scoring, and pipette-scores never sees generation provenance.
Every submission records benchmark version, token shape, model artifact, quantization, runtime version and settings, and device hardware and OS.Interactive explainer #mtp-pipette-x7k2 { background:#0B0D12 !important; border:1px solid #232833 !important; border-radius:14px !important; padding:0 !
important; margin:22px 0 !important; overflow:hidden !important; } #mtp-pipette-x7k2 iframe { width:100% !important; border:0 !important; display:block !important; background:#0B0D12 !
important; } #mtp-pipette-x7k2 p:empty, #mtp-pipette-x7k2 hr, #mtp-pipette-x7k2 del, #mtp-pipette-x7k2 s { display:none !important; } (function(){ var f=document.getElementById("mtp-pipette-x7k2-frame"); window.addEventListener("message",function(e){ if(e&&e.data&&e.data.pipetteHeight){ f.style.
height=e.data.pipetteHeight+"px"; f.setAttribute("height",e.data.pipetteHeight); } }); })(); Key Takeaways Pipette benchmarks configurations, not models: model + quantization + runtime + device.Apache 2.0 stack, 1,000+ configurations, 30+ models, three verified devices at launch.
Quality evals run on H100 references and are matched to on-device performance, not measured on-device.Identical parameter counts can differ 78.4% vs 33.8% in context-scaling retention.Check out the Technical Details and Leaderboard.
Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.
The post Liquid AI Open-Sources Pipette: A Reproducible Benchmarking Suite That Measures On-Device Models, Quantization, Runtime and Hardware Together appeared first on MarkTechPost.
Related
相關文章
Google 開源 Harness²:遞迴代理程式框架,無需新模型也能提升效能
Google Cloud AI Research 開源了 Harness²,這是一個遞迴代理程式框架,透過改良凍結模型周圍的程式碼與檔案來增強效能。對開發者而言,重點很簡單:你的代理程式無需更強大的模型也能進步。重點摘要:規模為框架而非模型,訓練參數為0,包含8個可編輯的框架元件,版本0.1.0。執行環境為Linux、Python 3.12或3.13搭配uv,模型呼叫則透過Vertex AI。GPU需求未公開。效能方面:一次改良步驟即可在3個基準測試中,提升所有4個模型與框架組合的表現。最佳成果:GLM-5搭配OpenCode在WorkBuddy-Bench上從64.2提升至75.7(+11.5點);最差表現:GLM-5搭配Codex在JobBench上僅提升1.2點(23.6至24.8)。什麼是Harness²?它是Google研究推出的即插即用框架。
如何利用NVIDIA結構化資料模型進行零訓練表格預測
In this tutorial, we implement Structured Data Models, NVIDIA’s new library that puts several pretrained foundation models for tables behind one PyTorch interface, and use it to make predictions without training.
認識 Kyutai REKI:2.4B VLA 模型為機器人操控帶來高效記憶
Kyutai 與 Inria 及 École des Ponts 合作,推出了 REKI——一個用於機器人操控的 2.4B 參數視覺-語言-動作模型(VLA)。該模型僅使用公開數據進行預訓練,並配備了輕量級的近期記憶功能。在三個分佈外基準測試中,僅有規模約為其兩倍的模型能超越它。所有模型權重已於今日在 Hugging Face 上公開。核心資訊:規模:2.4B 參數(2.2B Qwen3.5-2B VLM + 0.2B 流匹配動作專家)。記憶涵蓋最近 3 幀,間隔 1 秒。運行環境:在 1 張 NVIDIA H100 上進行基準測試。從兩個 256×256 攝像頭輸入,編譯後每個動作區塊耗時 21.8 毫秒。權重以 BF16 格式提供,暫無量化版本。性能:在 LIBERO-Plus 和 RoboTwin Clean2Rand 基準測試中,為公開數據預訓練的 VLA 模型中最優;在 LIBERO-Plus 上達到 90.4% 的最高分。
DeepSeek 發布 V4.1-Flash-1017,DeepSWE 得分 77.0,並開放搜尋 API
DeepSeek 剛發布 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017,這是其 V4.1-Flash 模型的新檢查點,現已在 DeepSeek 網站、應用程式及 API 上線。DeepSeek 宣稱該版本在性能、任務完成速度與輸出簡潔度上均優於 9 月發布的 V4.1-Flash,並稱之為性能與成本的帕累託改進。同時,DeepSeek 也向所有開發者開放了搜尋與擷取 API。對代理建構者而言,這意味著更便宜的編碼模型加上單一 API 金鑰即可使用的第一方網路層。重點摘要:骨架參數 552B,另加 196B 的 Engram 參數;預填充階段每 token 啟用 8B 參數,解碼階段啟用 16B 參數;上下文長度達 1M tokens,最大輸出 384K tokens。運行於 DeepSeek API 的 deepseek-flash 模型。9 月版的 V4.1-Flash 權重(763B 參數,FP8)採 MIT 授權。
2026年20款Jev替代方案:挑戰TypeSafe的決策模型
TypeSafe於2026年9月15日推出Jev,這是一款決策模型而非聊天機器人。使用者可定義允許的答案,Jev將回傳標籤、分數或是否的機率。約4週內,至少20款Jev替代方案相繼問世,來自Cloudflare、OpenAI、Perplexity、Liquid AI、AWS的Strands Labs及獨立開發者。本指南比較各方案在規模、授權、硬體、價格、Jev API相容性及已發布基準測試的表現。重點摘要:規模範圍從287M(GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide)到35B-A3B(Mapika Decider),Jev規模未公開。執行環境:Von和Laya等編碼器可在CPU上運行,4B適配器適用24 GB GPU或32 GB Mac。效能:多數開源模型在困難推理上落後Jev,但在狹窄分類任務上數款與之匹敵或超越。最佳表現:Cloudflare Clef在BANKING7取得94.20分。
長鑫科技市值兩月內跌去1萬億;阿里加碼AI硬件品牌,天貓、速賣通聯動;國行版蘋果AI有望12月上線,百度、阿里參與合作丨雷峰早報
要聞提示1.長鑫科技市值兩月內跌去1萬億2.年內已至少18次故障!DeepSeek發放宕機補償,有人拿到3000元3.阿里加碼AI硬件品牌,天貓、速賣通聯動4.國行版蘋果AI有望12月上線,百度、阿里參與合作5.可靈AI新一代模型Kling 4.