MarkTechPost AI生成式AI

Induction Labs Photon-1 Simulates Desktops, Plays Checkers, and Models Billiard Physics From One Pretraining Run

2026年7月26日 09:14

重點摘要

Most agents that learn from video need to know what action produced each frame. Induction Labs is arguing that this requirement is the bottleneck. Last week, they released imagination models, a foundation model architecture that pretrains on raw video with no action labels at all. Their test system is Photon-1, a sparse 106B-A5B mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformer trained on 18 years of computer demonstration video. On an internal computer use benchmark, Induction Labs reports that Photon-1 beats Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite while using far less pretraining compute and costing roughly 3× less to serve. What an imagination model actually does An imagination model predicts future frames autoregressively using a next-latent-token-prediction objective. It does not generate pixels during pretraining.

站內 AI 整理稿

Most agents that learn from video need to know what action produced each frame.Induction Labs is arguing that this requirement is the bottleneck.Last week, they released imagination models, a foundation model architecture that pretrains on raw video with no action labels at all.

Their test system is Photon-1, a sparse 106B-A5B mixture-of-experts (MoE) transformer trained on 18 years of computer demonstration video.On an internal computer use benchmark, Induction Labs reports that Photon-1 beats Gemini 3.

1 Flash-Lite while using far less pretraining compute and costing roughly 3× less to serve.What an imagination model actually does An imagination model predicts future frames autoregressively using a next-latent-token-prediction objective.It does not generate pixels during pretraining.

Everything is modeled in a learned representation space.The claim that matters is this: predicting future states teaches the model to complete tasks, even though it never sees an action during pretraining.Induction Labs calls this an implicit policy.

The model learns concepts of what a person is doing, rather than a label for each mouse click.The compression trick that makes it scale The architecture depends on a vision encoder that uses finite scalar quantization (FSQ).Each frame is compressed into 960 discrete tokens.

Each token is an 8-dimensional vector.Each dimension takes one of five values: −1, −1/2, 0, 1/2, 1.That gives a codebook of 5⁸ possible codes.The resulting encoding is about 2.2 KB per frame.

Induction Labs reports over 100× better compression than existing OCR and multimodal-model representations, while preserving text, layout and state changes.To hit that rate, Photon-1 uses a differential latent encoder.

It encodes video frames as pairs, so the latents describe differences between frames rather than frame contents.(function(){ window.addEventListener('message',function(e){ if(!e.data||e.data.mtpFrame!=='mtp-photon-explainer')return; var f=document.

getElementById('mtp-photon-explainer-frame'); if(f&&e.data.height)f.style.height=e.data.height+'px'; }); })(); Data and pretraining compute The corpus starts from an internal index of 2 billion publicly available videos.Filtering reduces that to roughly 2 million computer screen recordings.

An internal keyframe detection model strips redundant frames.The final dataset is 575 million frames, sampled at 1 frame per second.That equals 552 billion tokens, or about 18 years of video.Photon-1 was pretrained from scratch for a single epoch.

Training the 106B-A5B MoE at 32K context took approximately 30,000 H200 GPU-hours, or 4.4×10²² training FLOPs.The research team implemented training in PyTorch with custom fused kernels for the vision encoder and MoE layers, sustaining 40% end-to-end MFU.

Those three figures are mutually consistent: 30,000 H200-hours at 40% MFU lands almost exactly on 4.3×10²².From imagination to action Induction Labs finetuned Photon-1 on fewer than 35,000 computer use trajectories to teach the action and instruction format.

Special computer use tokens let the model emit actions.At inference, Photon-1 predicts the next frame’s state first, then outputs the action that gets there.Online reinforcement learning follows.

Rollouts run in real time on virtual machines at scale, and outcomes are verified programmatically to produce reward.

The Linux VMs run five desktop environments (LXQt, Xfce, MATE, GNOME and Plasma), each with a Google account for login-restricted web apps and an internal ChatGPT clone with no rate limits.The compute and cost comparison ModelPretraining computeWeighted inference cost / 1M tokens*Gemini 3.

1 Flash-Lite1.200 × 10²⁴ FLOPs$0.36Photon-10.044 × 10²⁴ FLOPs$0.11 *Weighted at a 10:1 input-to-output token ratio, which Induction Labs says matches its computer use tests.Two caveats belong next to that table.

First, the Gemini figure is Induction Labs’ own conservative estimate, assuming 8B active parameters and 25T pretraining tokens.

Taken at face value the ratio is about 27×, not the 30× headline; Induction Labs states “at least 30×” on the basis that the true Gemini number is likely higher and the model was likely distilled.Second, the benchmark is internal and unreleased, so the result is not independently reproducible today.

Photon-1’s own breakeven cost on Induction Labs’ hardware is $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens, with no speculative decoding.Does it generalize past the desktop?This is the more interesting test, because Photon-1 saw only computer use video.

The research team finetuned it on domains absent from pretraining and compared against two baselines: a vision encoder baseline with the same architecture and size but no imagination pretraining, and an LLM baseline (Ling-flash-2.0 from Inclusion AI, pretrained on 20T tokens).

On 20,000 tournament checkers games from the Open Checkers Archive 2.0, Photon-1 beat both baselines on world simulation and on move quality.On 10,000 synthetically generated billiard games simulated at 5 fps, it produced a mean absolute error of 0.

47 against the ground-truth physics engine, versus 1.15 for the LLM baseline and 1.44 for the vision encoder baseline.Photon-1 also picked up human priors from the pretraining video.

After RL, it learned to use the in-VM ChatGPT clone to draft artifacts and answer knowledge questions, steering the LLM the way a person would.Key Takeaways Photon-1 learns an implicit policy from 18 years of screen recordings with zero action labels, using next-latent-token prediction.

FSQ compresses each frame to 960 tokens (~2.2 KB), a reported 100× gain over OCR and multimodal representations.Trained for ~30,000 H200 GPU-hours, it beats Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite on an internal benchmark at ~27× less pretraining compute.

Despite seeing only desktop video, it beats an LLM baseline at checkers and billiard physics after finetuning.No weights, no API, no license — this is a research result, not a deployable model.Check out the full technical writeup from Induction Labs and the announcement thread on X.

All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project.The post Induction Labs Photon-1 Simulates Desktops, Plays Checkers, and Models Billiard Physics From One Pretraining Run appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Related

相關文章

六巨頭定AI插件新標準,撞臉Claude,Anthropic沒上桌

六大科技巨頭(AWS、Anysphere、GitHub、微軟、OpenAI、Vercel)聯合發布AI智能體插件統一開放規範Agent Plugins 1.0.0,旨在統一插件打包格式,減少開發者重複勞動。該規範的結構與Anthropic的Claude Code插件系統高度相似,但Anthropic並未參與制定,而是繼續經營自己的封閉生態。

2 小時前
鈦媒體生成式AI

DeepSeek重啟融資,三年市值對齊騰訊?

DeepSeek重啟第二輪融資,以5000億元人民幣估值尋求籌集80億美元,但網傳一份由小型醫藥私募發起的專項基金募資材料引發網友質疑,後經DeepSeek員工證實部分數據屬實。該公司近期宣布API大幅漲價,可能打破其以低價換規模的估值邏輯,面臨客戶流失風險。市場關注其能否從「價格屠夫」轉型為價值提供商,以及三年內市值能否對齊騰訊等巨頭。

3 小時前

可靈AI核心技術骨幹王鑫濤被曝離職

快手可靈AI核心技術骨幹王鑫濤被曝離職,去向未知,快手官方與本人均未回應。王鑫濤是圖像與視頻生成領域知名開源項目主要作者,被視為可靈從0到1的關鍵推手。其離職發生在可靈完成獨立融資、估值180億美元的關鍵階段,可能影響研發進度與競爭優勢。

3 小時前

AI短劇、漫劇、戀綜、電影、藝人都有了,AI觀眾也不遠了

2026年AI影視內容全面爆發,從短劇、長劇到電影、綜藝,AI製作的作品大量湧現,衛視也開始播出AI短劇。AI演員如方桃子迅速走紅,商業變現能力驚人,廣告報價甚至超過許多真人網紅。AI短劇市場規模已突破220億元,用戶超過6億,但同時也引發了對真人演員就業和內容品質的擔憂。

3 小時前