Contrastive-LM 發布 CLM-8B:開放式 System One 模型,評分代理動作速度比 Jev 快達 9 倍
Contrastive-LM has released CLM-8B, the first open model in a new class called Contrastive Language Models (CLMs).CLM does not generate text.It scores a set of candidate actions against the current state and returns probabilities.
Their main baseline is Jev, the proprietary System One model from TypeSafe AI.Is it deployable?Yes.The Apache-2.0 head weighs 75 MB.It runs on 1 NVIDIA GPU under Linux, with vLLM serving the Qwen3-8B encoder.What a System One Model Does Jev entered limited early access on 15 September 2026.
It returns typed values with probabilities instead of text.CLM targets the same interface.The CLM GitHub repo serves CLM-8B behind a TypeSafe-compatible API.It exposes 3 question types: Noul: returns the probability that a statement is true.
Choice: picks one option from a declared set, with probabilities.Score: returns an expected level on an ordered rubric.A request written for TypeSafe’s API can be replayed through CLM’s Python client.How CLM Works CLM trains a state encoder and an action encoder with a bidirectional InfoNCE loss.
Each encoder is a frozen Qwen3-8B backbone plus a 20M-parameter trainable projection head.Training pulls each state toward the action actually taken and pushes it away from the others.At inference, CLM scores each candidate by the dot product of the state and action embeddings.
A softmax over those scores becomes the answer distribution.The same primitive ranks best-of-N solutions, routes tools and answers typed decisions.This design disaggregates states and actions.In an agent loop, the state changes every step while the action set stays mostly fixed.
clm-serve reserves a slab of GPU memory, similar to vLLM’s KV cache, and reuses cached vectors.On 1 RTX 4090 with 3 actions, revisited states drop from 1.7 ms to 0.6 ms.The model card reports CLM running 13× faster than Jev with about 1,000 candidates.
A 3-Stage Training Recipe Pre-training on ~60M Nemotron DQA question-answer pairs.Mid-training on ~30M synthetic hard negatives generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.Post-training on ~1M agent trajectories from Agent Data Protocol, Endless-Terminals and LiteCoder-Terminal-SFT.
On ~100K held-out questions, pre-training alone reaches 52.1% top-1 accuracy.Mid-training lifts it to 69.2%.Training on hard negatives from the start peaks at 62.4%, then overfits.Zero-Shot Results Against Jev TaskCLM-8B latencyJev latencyCLM-8B successJev successT-Rex game16.5 ms149.
8 ms5/55/5Tool calling (BFCL v4)76.8 ms125.5 ms95.2%99.2%WikiRacing79.8 ms225 ms26/3030/30Super Mario33.5 ms132.6 ms5/55/5 The 9× figure comes from the T-Rex game, where actions repeat across states.CLM matches Jev on T-Rex and Super Mario.
It trails on tool calling and WikiRacing while running faster on every task.CLM as a Verifier for Coding Agents Here a generator samples several candidate solutions and the verifier picks one.Opus 5 produced DeepSWE candidates (best-of-4).Fable 5 produced Terminal-Bench 2.1 candidates (best-of-5).
The team evaluated 38 held-out DeepSWE tasks and 30 held-out Terminal-Bench 2.1 tasks.Latency was measured on an H100.BenchmarkPass@1CLM (fine-tuned)JevCLM latencyJev latencyDeepSWE73.7%81.6%71.1%79 ms449 msTerminal-Bench 2.184.0%87.6%83.
1%32 ms131 ms The research team reports these as new SOTA verifier results.Jev scores below pass@1 on both benchmarks, so selecting with Jev is worse than taking 1 sample.CLM runs 4.1× to 5.7× faster.These numbers use lightweight fine-tuned heads, not the zero-shot checkpoint.
They are held-out subset results, not full leaderboard submissions.Interactive Explainer (function(){var f=document.getElementById('mtp-clm-embed');if(!f)return; window.addEventListener('message',function(e){if(e.source!==f.contentWindow)return;var d=e.data;if(d&&typeof d.mtpClmHeight==='number'){f.
style.height=d.mtpClmHeight+'px';}});})(); Key Takeaways CLM-8B scores candidate actions instead of generating text.Up to 9× lower latency than Jev in zero-shot tests.Fine-tuned heads reach 81.6% on DeepSWE and 87.6% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 subsets.
Cached state and action vectors cut agent-loop latency.Apache-2.0 head, self-hosted on 1 NVIDIA GPU.Check out the Blog, Code and Data & Models.All credit goes to the researcher of this project.
Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.?
Connect with us The post Contrastive-LM Releases CLM-8B: An Open System One Model That Scores Agent Actions Up to 9× Faster Than Jev appeared first on MarkTechPost.
Related
相關文章

谷歌確認新一代旗艦模型 Gemini 4 即將推出,有望不用等到年底
作者:清源 責編:清源 評論: 9 月 24 日消息,The Information 當地時間 23 日舉辦的 AI Agenda Live 峰會上,谷歌 DeepMind 負責人科拉伊 · 卡武克奧盧透露,谷歌新一代旗艦模型 Gemini 4 即將推出,現已進入開發流程中的後訓練初期。

ChatGPT 移動端上新語音智能體:動動嘴就能寫文檔、總結郵件
據瞭解,Pro 和 Plus 訂閱用戶可在手機上使用"工作"創建文檔、撰寫電子郵件或總結 Slack 消息,還能執行創建網站、製作 PPT、使用雲端瀏覽器等進階操作;Free 和 Go 訂閱用戶則可使用插件與已連接的應用。OpenAI 表示,ChatGPT 的語音對話將提供更豐富的文本輸出,Plus 訂閱用戶可在文本與語音之間輕鬆切換,或者先在手機上處理工作、再轉移到電腦上繼續。

騰訊混元把經典臨界批大小理論搬進大模型強化學習,PPO生成吞吐最高拉到2.29倍、GRPO省下29%訓練時間
騰訊混元團隊最新研究把目光投向了一個被忽視已久的老問題:當模型自己生成訓練數據、且rollout生成與訓練本身以不同節奏縮放時,批大小這門手藝該怎麼重做。研究從經典的臨界批大小理論出發,把它重新推演到在線大語言模型強化學習這個新場景。結論很務實:在GRPO和PPO這兩類主流算法裡,只要在擴大批大小的有界範圍內重新調一調學習率,就能保住"每條響應"該學到的東西不被稀釋。

月之暗面最強 AI:消息稱 Kimi K3.1 下月登場
作者:故淵 責編:故淵 評論: 感謝網友 華南吳彥祖 的線索投遞!9 月 24 日消息,科技媒體 Wccftech 昨日(9 月 23 日)發佈博文,報道稱月之暗面(Moonshot)正醞釀推出 Kimi K3.1 模型,並將提供 Low、High、Max 共 3 檔推理強度,預估會在下月(2026 年 10 月)登場。

Anthropic Claude Code 雲會話正式上線,Pro / Max 用戶可領 100~250 美元額度
作者:問舟 責編:問舟 評論: 感謝網友 咩咩洋 的線索投遞!9 月 24 日消息,Anthropic 今日宣佈 Claude Code 雲會話功能結束預覽、正式上線。該功能讓用戶在關閉電腦後,讓任務在雲端繼續運行,並可從瀏覽器、手機、桌面應用或終端查看和接管。

AI團隊重組頻上熱搜:豆包回應“對話團隊砍掉一半”傳聞不實
此前有媒體報道豆包通用Session團隊出現人員縮減,網絡上隨之出現“豆包裁員”“對話團隊砍掉一半”等說法,並有網傳內部員工感慨“豆包正在被邊緣化”。豆包公關負責人劉星發文回應稱,相關報道實為豆包Session團隊的組織調整,部分自媒體將其解讀為裁員,信息不實。