Cloudflare Releases Clairic, a System One Extraction Model on Workers AI
Cloudflare has released a preview of Clairic, a new System One extraction model on Workers AI.The Cloudflare Clairic extraction model reads text or images and returns typed values, not generated text.It targets a job developers usually give to LLMs: pulling totals, dates and IDs into JSON.
Clairic answers every requested field in 1 forward pass, with no reasoning and no output tokens.TL;DR Size: Parameter count not disclosed.65,536-token context window, up to 4 images per request.Runs on: Cloudflare-hosted GPUs via Workers AI (@cf/cloudflare/clairic).
No local option until weights ship.Performance: Sub-second extraction in Cloudflare’s tests.No standard accuracy benchmark is published yet.Best: Extraction step took 0.46 s vs 16.1 s for GLM-5.3 in Cloudflare’s claims pipeline.Worst: 4 of 21 TSA next-day forecasts fell outside its 80% interval.
Multi-step arithmetic is unreliable.What is Clairic?Clairic is a Cloudflare model that extracts, computes, estimates and forecasts typed values from unstructured inputs.It builds on the System One idea from TypeSafe’s Jev, named for Kahneman’s fast, intuitive thinking.
Jev and Cloudflare’s own Clef are decision models.They score options you list in advance.Clairic covers answers you cannot list, such as an invoice total, a date or a repair cost.Cloudflare frames a 3-part stack.Extraction models turn raw input into typed values.
Decision models turn values into decisions.LLMs turn decisions into words.How does a Clairic request work?A request has a state (text plus up to 4 images) and a map of named, typed fields.Each field can carry plain-language instructions.
Supported types are text, number, date, time, datetime, duration, list, estimate and forecast, per the Workers AI changelog.Every scalar answer includes pnull, the probability that the value is absent, plus a confidence score.Text answers return exact spans with character offsets.
Estimates and forecasts return a median and an 80% interval, from p10 to p90.Forecasts cover up to 64 steps.There is no field limit.Fields that do not fit beside the input in one 8,192-token pass split into parallel passes.Each pass sees the whole input.
In the docs example, a 61-token invoice ran in 3 passes.It billed 655 input tokens, including 472 schema tokens.Wide schemas can cost more than the document itself.What did Cloudflare’s tests show?In a support-email example, Clairic added price and tax into $701.10.
It also computed 11 days since delivery.Neither number appears in the email.A missing tracking number returned null instead of a plausible guess.On a skewed receipt photo, it read all 7 present values and returned null for the absent discount.Its lowest confidence was 0.776, on the order number.
For forecasting, Cloudflare predicted daily TSA checkpoint counts for 21 days.Average error was 3.3%.17 of 21 actual counts fell inside the 80% interval.3 of the 4 misses fell on Columbus Day weekend.The main test is a damaged-product claims pipeline.
Clairic extracted facts, Clef chose refund or repair, and GLM-5.3 wrote the reply.Cloudflare compared this against GLM-5.3 handling all 3 steps.#mtp-clairic-wrap{max-width:880px!important;margin:24px auto!important;padding:0!important;background:transparent!important;border:0!
important;} #mtp-clairic-wrap iframe{display:block!important;width:100%!important;border:0!important;background:transparent!important;height:600px;} #mtp-clairic-wrap p:empty,#mtp-clairic-wrap hr,#mtp-clairic-wrap del,#mtp-clairic-wrap s{display:none!
important;} @media (max-width:640px){#mtp-clairic-wrap{margin:16px auto!important;}} (function(){var f=document.getElementById('mtp-clairic-frame');window.addEventListener('message',function(e){if(e.data&&e.data.mtpClairicHeight&&f&&e.source===f.contentWindow){f.style.height=e.data.
mtpClairicHeight+'px';}});})(); The cascade finished in 19.3 s versus 61.7 s, about 3.2x faster.Extraction took 0.46 s against 16.1 s.The decision step took 0.22 s against 21.9 s.Cost per million claims fell 49%, from $11,740 to $6,032.The reply step still dominated, at 18.6 of the 19.3 s.
Both pipelines got the facts and decision right.Clairic’s repair estimate was identical across runs.GLM-5.3 returned $250, $250 and $220.Cloudflare says Gemma 4 and Qwen failed the all-LLM version.How does Clairic compare with Clef, Jev and GLM-5.3?MetricsClairicClefJevGLM-5.
3 DeveloperCloudflareCloudflareTypeSafe AIZ.
aiClassSystem One extractionSystem One decisionSystem One decisionSystem Two LLM (reasoning)OutputTyped values: spans, numbers, dates, durations, lists, estimates, forecastsProbabilities over options you listTyped decisions with calibrated probabilitiesFree-form textParametersNot disclosed27BNot disclosedNot disclosedContext window65,536 tokens65,536 tokensNot disclosed1,048,576 tokensImage inputYes, up to 4Yes (text, JSON, images, video)Not disclosedNot disclosedInput price$0.
10 / M tokens$0.24 / M tokens$0.042 / M tokens$1.40 / M tokensOutput priceNoneNoneFree$4.40 / M tokensSpeed0.46 s extraction step (Cloudflare test)209.3 ms median (Cloudflare evals)70 to 500 ms end to end (TypeSafe)16.
1 s extraction step (Cloudflare test)AvailabilityWorkers AI preview; open weights plannedWorkers AI; Apache 2.0 weightsTypeSafe API, early accessWorkers AI, Paid plan Where can developers use it, and what does it cost?Clairic is live as a preview at @cf/cloudflare/clairic.
Call it through the Workers AI binding with env.AI.run() or the REST API.AI Gateway works with the same endpoints.Pricing is $0.10 per million input tokens with no output charge.That undercuts Clef’s $0.24 but sits above Jev’s $0.042.Weights are promised but not yet released.
Key Takeaways Clairic returns typed values, not text, in 1 forward pass.$0.10 per million input tokens; output tokens cost nothing.Extraction ran in 0.46 s vs 16.1 s for GLM-5.3.Every answer carries confidence, pnull, spans or intervals.
Check out the Cloudflare blog post, the Clairic model docs, the extraction models explainer and the Workers AI changelog.Also read our earlier coverage of Drex 1.5.All credit goes to the researcher of this project.
Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.Wait!are you on telegram?now you can join us on telegram as well.The post Cloudflare Releases Clairic, a System One Extraction Model on Workers AI appeared first on MarkTechPost.
Related
相關文章
DeepSeek 再掀開源浪潮:內部推理框架 DeepInfer 全面公開,劍指"大模型普惠"
這家公司想補上的,是一個長期躲在聚光燈之外的環節——推理框架。在 DeepSeek 的定義裡,模型的能力上限由模型本身決定,但"怎樣以合理成本把超大規模模型供出去",靠的是這層中間架構。訓練讓模型學有所成,推理才讓它為人所用。當海量用戶同時調用,推理框架負責統籌調度龐雜的算力集群,其效率高低,直接撬動著 AI 服務的算力開銷與耗電——它既不像模型權重那樣吸睛,卻是把實驗室能力搬進現實的關鍵閘口。
DeepSeek 開源內部推理框架 DeepInfer,要把大模型服務的成本打下來
這家公司點明瞭一個長期被公眾忽視的中間層:大模型的能力上限由模型本身劃定,但如何以合理成本撐起超大規模的模型服務,真正取決於推理框架。訓練讓模型"學有所成",推理則讓模型"為人所用"。面對如今海量的用戶調用,推理框架負責統籌調度龐大的算力集群,它的效率直接決定了 AI 服務的算力成本與電力消耗。
DeepSeek 開源推理框架 DeepInfer:推理成本成為 AI 普惠的關鍵一層
官方指出,大模型的能力邊界由模型本身劃定,但如何以合理成本提供超大規模模型服務,還取決於推理框架這一中間層——它統籌調度龐大的算力集群,其效率直接決定 AI 服務的算力成本與電力消耗。DeepInfer 集成高性能算子與深度優化的推理引擎,支持分佈式推理、推測解碼、SWA Bounded Replay、結構化輸出等能力,同時兼容英偉達與華為昇騰平臺。
Gartner 潑冷水:7 萬億美元 AI 基建到 2030 年只能回本約一半
然而到 2030 年,這些重金堆出的資產最多隻能產出 3.6 萬億美元收入——換句話說,投出去的錢,屆時連一半都收不回來。高級總監分析師 Will Sommer 算了一筆更嚴苛的賬:把融資成本和 12% 的投資回報率一併計入,要與 7 萬億美元的投入相抵,實際需要的收入高達 8.
奇瑞 CheryMind 垂域基礎大模型發佈,宣稱"為物理 AI 而生"
奇瑞給出的落地數據相當紮實:超過6萬名員工每天都在使用 CheryMind,模型已經覆蓋200多個業務場景,打通了400多套企業系統,啃下了700TB 的企業知識庫和200PB 的工程數據。在奇瑞的描述裡,這不再是實驗室裡的 Demo,而是一套正在重塑企業運轉方式的真實基礎設施——它把散落在各部門、各系統裡的數據和方法,收攏進同一個會思考的底座,去驅動一家車企的日常經營與研發。
開源工具 Strata 0.2 重磅發佈:硬件門檻再降 16GB,本地流暢跑千億大模型
作為一款致力於讓普通家用電腦流暢運行 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next、Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 等大語言模型的開源利器,Strata 在本次升級中不僅推出了全新的獨立圖形界面,還進一步大幅降低了本地部署的硬件門檻。在硬件配置要求上,新版本對內存與顯存(RAM + VRAM)的綜合佔用進行了深度優化。