AMP1 零樣本在真機試驗中完成一百零四次
Computer Science > Robotics arXiv:2611.09892 (cs) [Submitted on 6 Nov 2026] Title:On Agentic Manipulation Policies Authors:Chen Chen, Omid Bagherieh, Naveen Nikamanth Appiah Balaji, Jesse T.Gonzalez, Negin Heravi, Fahad Islam, Xueting Li, Jean-Baptiste Regli, Kejia Ren, Petr Švec, David J.
Yoon, Matthias Müller, Vladlen Koltun View a PDF of the paper titled On Agentic Manipulation Policies, by Chen Chen and 12 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Recent work on robot manipulation has focused on specialist policies trained on demonstrations.
We show that generalist AI models can control manipulators more reliably than specialist policies such as vision-language-action models (VLAs) and world-action models (WAMs).
We systematically analyze agentic manipulation policies (AMPs), in which a generalist AI model commands the manipulator directly, adapting its actions as the task unfolds.We present AMP1, a reference harness that runs unchanged across single-arm, bimanual, and mobile manipulation.
AMP1 achieves state-of-the-art results on the RoboLab-120 and CaP-Gym benchmarks, with no demonstrations or task-specific training.On RoboLab-120, AMP1 reaches an 85.6\% success rate zero-shot, compared to 49.2\% and 42.9\% for leading VLA and WAM policies.
The agent succeeds zero-shot in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances, reducing failure rates by 20x and 15x relative to strong VLA and WAM baselines.
The basic harness supplies no grasping, pushing, or placing skills; the agent develops its own strategies, such as searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating its cameras.
With the addition of a persistent memory store, the agent can also learn from experience: an augmented harness with a memory representation that is carried across episodes lowers the failure rate on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment.
Our analysis suggests that AMPs are substantially more general and robust than specialist manipulation policies, providing a promising foundation for robot manipulation.Comments: Videos and code available at: this https URL Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.
AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2611.09892 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2611.09892v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.
09892 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Matthias Müller [view email] [v1] Fri, 6 Nov 2026 18:59:34 UTC (24,323 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled On Agentic Manipulation Policies, by Chen Chen and 12 other authorsView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.
RO < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-11 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CV cs.LG References & Citations SciXGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading...BibTeX formatted citation × loading...
Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.
ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?
) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.
AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?
) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy.arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.Which authors of this paper are endorsers?| Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Related
相關文章
操作系統如何適配Agent時代?openEuler新方案來了,超節點OS大幅降低時延
作者 | 楊京麗 編輯 | 李水青 11月10日報道,10月9日,在Agentic Infra操作系統大會&openEuler Summit 2026媒體預溝通會上,國內開源操作系統openEuler預告其將發佈超節點操作系統(OS)相關成果及面向Agentic Infra的技術突破,內容覆蓋Agent可觀測與安全治理、極速沙箱、智能體記憶系統以及KV Cache優化。 OpenAtom openEuler社區執行總監劉飛談道,智能體基礎設施需要同時解決啟動速度、併發密度和任務生命週期等問題。
Agent 4天覆現人類5個月實驗!谷歌DeepMind拿下兩項密碼分析新成果
數字簽名偽造:兩個AI智能體不到4天覆現實驗,CPU計算量減少約72% 在簽名實驗中,研究人員讓AI智能體先完成前期數據準備,查詢模擬簽名接口。待接口關閉後,再為此前未知的新目標生成有效簽名。前期,AI智能體編寫的程序自行選擇輸入,向接口發起約40.
當 20 萬員工遇上 2000 萬智能體:納德拉描繪微軟新編制
節目裡,他拋出一句被反覆轉發的暢想:假如微軟未來坐擁 20 萬名員工,再配上 200 萬乃至 2000 萬個智能體一起幹活,會是什麼光景。這段切片出自霍夫曼的播客《Possible》,真實發布日期是今年 6 月 5 日。納德拉當時用"我想知道"開場,本屬設想之辭,但後續又主動點回這一數字,直言"微軟或許會擁有 2000 萬個智能體",讓玩笑話多了幾分認真。
未來 20 萬員工將與 2000 萬個 AI 智能體協同,微軟已為其開發專屬管理系統
顛覆想象的未來圖景:2000萬智能體與20萬員工共事在節目中,納德拉提出了一個極具顛覆性的假設:“假如我們未來擁有20萬名員工,同時加上200萬個、甚至2000萬個智能體參與工作,究竟會變成什麼樣?”他將這種人機共事的未來趨勢,與20世紀80年代的情況進行了類比。
xAI 全面升級 Grok Bot,重點優化 Token 效率與智能表現
近日,xAI 團隊核心成員 Matt Palmer 連同平臺創始人埃隆·馬斯克(Elon Musk)在 X 平臺上相繼發聲,正式宣佈針對 Grok Bot 的 Token 效率提升與智能行為改進工作已全面展開。核心痛點攻堅:聚焦 Token 效率與交互行為升級在過去的一段時間裡,許多開發者和企業團隊選擇基於 Grok Bot 構建了大量核心工作流與自動化應用。
當 AI 在加速狂奔,什麼反而應該“慢”下來?
加速時代的悖論:當“你的 AI”開始對“我的 AI”說話2026 年,人工智能正在經歷一次深刻的角色跨越:從過去幾年的“對話交互”,全面走向“自主交付”。過去,AI 停留在屏幕側邊欄的對話框裡,你問它答,提供的是參考建議;而今天,智能體(Agent)開始走出對話框,真正嵌入日常工作流。