Google 推出 Gemini 3.6 Flash、3.5 Flash-Lite 與 3.5 Flash Cyber:更便宜、更節省 token 的 Flash 系列,專為代理型工作負載打造

重點摘要
開發者打造生產級代理需要更高的 token 效率、更低的延遲與更可靠的效能。今日 Google 推出三款全新 Gemini 模型,分別是 Gemini 3.6 Flash、Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 與 Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber。三者皆屬 Flash 系列,Google 針對速度、成本與高吞吐量的代理型工作進行調校,而非追求極致的推理深度。Gemini 3.6 Flash 在品質、token 用量與價格上均有改善,成為新的預設主力模型。它基於 3.5 Flash 發展,鎖定程式碼生成、知識工作與多模態任務,重點在於效率。根據 Artificial Analysis Index,3.6 Flash 比 3.5 Flash 減少 17% 的輸出 token;而在 Datacurve 的 DeepSWE 基準測試中,Google 報告最高可減少 65%。該模型所需的推理步驟也更少。
Developers building production agents need higher token efficiency, lower latency, and more reliable performance. Today, Google has released three new Gemini models. The lineup is Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. All three sit in the Flash tier, which Google tunes for speed, cost, and high-volume agentic work rather than maximum reasoning depth. Gemini 3.6 Flash: better quality, fewer tokens, lower price Gemini 3.6 Flash is the new default workhorse. It builds on 3.5 Flash and targets coding, knowledge work, and multimodal tasks. The main point is efficiency. On the Artificial Analysis Index, 3.6 Flash uses 17% fewer output tokens than 3.5 Flash. On the DeepSWE benchmark by Datacurve, Google reports up to a 65% reduction. The model also takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls per multi-step workflow. Pricing moves down alongside efficiency. Gemini 3.6 Flash is priced at $1.50 per 1M input tokens and $7.50 per 1M output tokens. The output rate drops from the previous $9.00 on 3.5 Flash. Lower verbosity and a lower output price reduces the total cost per agentic task. Quality gains accompany the efficiency gains. On DeepSWE, 3.6 Flash scores 49% versus 37% for 3.5 Flash. On MLE Bench, it reaches 63.9% versus 49.7%. On OSWorld-Verified, it hits 83.0% versus 78.4%. On GDPval-AA v2, a knowledge-work benchmark, it scores 1421 versus 1349. Computer use is now a built-in client-side tool through the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise. Early customers including Hebbia and Harvey cite gains in document parsing, chart and data analysis, and report drafting. Google is shipping 3.6 Flash with enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These cover Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) and cyber-offense misuse. Full details are in the 3.6 Flash model card. The interactive explainer below lets you compare each model against its predecessor and estimate token cost at your own volume. (function(){ window.addEventListener('message', function(e){ var d = e.data || {}; if(d && d.mtpEmbed === 'explorer' && typeof d.height === 'number'){ var f = document.getElementById('mtp-gemini-explorer'); if(f){ f.style.height = Math.max(320, d.height) + 'px'; } } }); })(); Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: the fastest model in the 3.5 line Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is highlighted for low-latency and high-throughput jobs. Target use cases include agentic search and document processing. As measured by Artificial Analysis, it runs at 350 output tokens per second. Pricing is $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $2.50 per 1M output tokens. The model clears the prior 3.1 Flash-Lite by wide margins. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it scores 54% versus 31%. On GDM-MRCR v2, a long-context benchmark, it reaches 72.2% versus 60.1%. On GDPval-AA v2, it scores 1140 versus 642. Notably, Flash-Lite also beats the older 3 Flash on some evals. It leads on SWE-Bench Pro at 54.2% versus 49.6% and on OSWorld-Verified at 74.0% versus 65.1%. Flash-Lite exposes configurable thinking levels: minimal, low, and higher. Developers can prioritize low-cost, low-latency execution for high-volume tasks. They can also engage higher thinking levels for multi-step subagent workloads. Computer use is a built-in tool here too. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in CodeMender: cheap agents that find and patch bugs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is the most specialized release. It is built on 3.5 Flash and fine-tuned to find, validate, and patch software vulnerabilities. The design premise is the search-space problem. Finding deep flaws means exploring an immense execution search space. A single call to one massive model becomes a bottleneck. The answer is a cheap model called many times. Inside CodeMender, Google’s code-security agent, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents run in parallel. CodeMender invokes the model up to five times, then merges the sub-agent findings into one report. On the CyberGym benchmark, this setup reaches competitive performance against much larger models. The internal evaluations are striking. On Google’s Big Sleep evaluation, Flash Cyber significantly surpassed mainline 3.5 Flash and 3.6 Flash. On the V8 JavaScript engine, it found 55 unique confirmed issues at a fixed number of invocations. That compares to 47 for mainline 3.5 Flash and 36 for Claude Opus 4.6. It caught 10 issues the other two models missed. In one real-world test, Google’s Cloud Vulnerability Research team used it to find remote-code-execution flaws in public APIs within two hours. https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/ Community Reaction Reaction split along predictable lines. Builders welcomed the price and efficiency. The delayed flagship drew the loudest criticism. On Hacker News, some argued Google is over-selling capacity it cannot reliably provision, citing frustrating hands-on coding sessions. The gated Flash Cyber release opened a dual-use debate about who should hold automated exploit-finding tools. The dashboard below aggregates that discussion by platform. It is a qualitative editorial synthesis, not a scraped dataset, and the method note is embedded. (function(){ window.addEventListener('message', function(e){ var d = e.data || {}; if(d && d.mtpEmbed === 'sentiment' && typeof d.height === 'number'){ var f = document.getElementById('mtp-gemini-sentiment'); if(f){ f.style.height = Math.max(320, d.height) + 'px'; } } }); })(); Availability Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite are available starting today. Developers can access them through the Gemini API via Google AI Studio and Android Studio. Gemini 3.6 Flash is also in Google Antigravity and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Enterprises get both models in the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, with 3.6 Flash in the Gemini Enterprise app. Everyone can use them via the Gemini app, and 3.5 Flash-Lite is rolling out in Google Search. Start with the Developer Guide. Key Takeaways Gemini 3.6 Flash cuts output tokens by 17% (up to 65% on DeepSWE) and drops the output price from $9.00 to $7.50 per 1M. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite runs at 350 tokens/sec for $0.30/$2.50 per 1M and beats the older 3 Flash on SWE-Bench Pro and OSWorld-Verified. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber powers CodeMender with cheap multi-agent scans; it found 55 unique V8 issues versus 47 and 36 for 3.5 Flash and Opus 4.6. Flash Cyber is gated to governments and trusted partners under a limited-access pilot due to dual-use risk. The post Google Releases Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber: A Cheaper, More Token-Efficient Flash Tier Built for Agentic Workloads appeared first on MarkTechPost.
Related
相關文章

谷歌推出Gemini 3.6 Flash,3.5 Flash-LITE,以及3.5 Flash Cyber
谷歌AI突然“開火”:三款Gemini模型齊發,最高降價近七成,旗艦3.5 Pro仍難產 李丹 發表於 2026年07月21日 15:19 摘要:Gemini 3.6 Flash主打代碼、知識工作和多模態任務,在減少輸出Token消耗的同時,價格也低於上一代;Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite瞄準高吞吐、低延遲場景;Gemini 3.

Google要把AI大模型「刻」進芯片裡
Google正推動將大型AI模型直接固化在晶片硬體層級,以減少對外部記憶體與頻寬的依賴。此技術若成真,可大幅降低推論階段的延遲與功耗,對大規模部署生成式AI服務極具戰略意義。

AI獨角獸創始人最新判斷:90%企業AI場景,已經不需要最強模型
AI獨角獸Glean創辦人指出,目前超過九成企業AI應用場景不需使用最強模型,開源模型已能滿足多數需求。企業導入AI的真正瓶頸在於上下文工程,而非模型能力,模型商品化將使價值轉向應用層。應用公司應深入客戶核心工作流程,不必過度擔心模型廠商直接競爭。

WAIC觀點:最快兩年,迎來機器人“ChatGPT時刻”
在2026世界人工智能大會上,具身智能企業聚焦機器人真實場景落地,業界認為最快兩年內將迎來機器人「ChatGPT時刻」。然而,訓練世界模型仍面臨數據、表徵與閉環三大挑戰,各企業在數據來源與模型架構上各有不同策略。

印奇的手機,階躍星辰的賭局
根據鈦媒體的報導,印奇的手機業務與階躍星辰的賭局成為近期科技圈的討論焦點。印奇作為曠視科技的創始人,其跨足手機領域的動作引發市場關注;而階躍星辰則被報導描述為在一場AI技術的賭局中下注。報導聚焦於兩者之間的戰略關聯與市場風險,但目前僅能從標題中窺見其核心方向,具體的產品細節、合作夥伴及定價策略等資訊尚未完整揭露。

在下一個模型發佈之前
賬號設置我的關注我的收藏申請的報道退出登錄登錄搜索36氪Auto數字時氪未來消費智能湧現未來城市啟動Power on36氪出海36氪研究院潮生TIDE36氪企服點評36氪財經職場bonus36碳後浪研究所暗湧Waves硬氪氪睿研究院媒體品牌企業號企服點評36Kr研究院36Kr創新諮詢企業服務核心服務城市之窗政府服務創投發佈LP源計劃VClubVClub投資機。