大模型榜單夾具變量風險
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.21382 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Jul 2026] Title:There Is No Neutral Harness: Modern LLM Leaderboards Are Manufactured by Config-Fragile Items Authors:V.S.
Raghu Parupudi View a PDF of the paper titled There Is No Neutral Harness: Modern LLM Leaderboards Are Manufactured by Config-Fragile Items, by V.S.
Raghu Parupudi View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multiple-choice benchmarks fix the questions and the correct answers, but not the harness: the order of the options, the wording of the prompt, and whether a language model's answer is read from generated text or from per-option likelihoods.
Work on this harness sensitivity reports it as aggregate score variance, leaving unexamined which items the variance falls on and whether they are the items that separate one model from the next.
We treat the evaluation harness of large language models (LLMs) as an independent variable and resolve its effect to single items.
We introduce the \textit{fragility grid}: 12 open-weight instruction-tuned LLMs from 4 families answer the same 3{,}679 items from 4 benchmarks (ARC, HellaSwag, MMLU, TruthfulQA) under 26 equally defensible harness configurations, recording one correctness bit for every model, item, and configuration.
The comparison is matched, since the items, the weights, and the greedy decoding stay fixed while only the harness varies.Under the grid a model's score is a band rather than a point: gemma4-31b scores between 31 and 89 percent depending only on the harness.Three results follow.
On the items that two adjacent models both answer stably the pair is tied, and config-fragile items carry 95.7 percent of a pair's gap on average.Four of the 12 models reach rank one under some configuration, so the harness selects the winner.
Item discrimination, the property that benchmark-compression methods maximize, correlates with fragility at 0.28 (95 percent CI 0.25 to 0.30), so compression keeps the fragile items rather than removing them.
The scoring choice, not the option order that protocols usually fix, is the load-bearing axis.
We release the per-item records and the analysis script, from which every number regenerates on a CPU in seconds, and we position the fragility grid as a check a leaderboard can run before it reports an order.Comments: 25 pages in total Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.
21382 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.21382v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.
21382 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: V Subrahmanya Raghu Ram Kishore Parupudi [view email] [v1] Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:28:29 UTC (80 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled There Is No Neutral Harness: Modern LLM Leaderboards Are Manufactured by Config-Fragile Items, by V.
S.Raghu ParupudiView PDFHTML (experimental)TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADSGoogle Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading...BibTeX formatted citation × loading...
Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.
ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?
) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.
AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?
) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy.arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?Learn more about arXivLabs.Which authors of this paper are endorsers?| Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Related
相關文章
AI 浪潮下的社區無奈謝幕:知名反編譯追蹤網站decomp.dev宣佈關閉
該網站曾致力於集中展示匹配反編譯的進展,並凝聚志同道合的技術愛好者。然而,隨著近年來人工智能技術的迅猛發展,開源協作生態遭到嚴重破壞,創始人最終決定讓其退居為歷史數據存檔。匹配反編譯長期以來是一項極度耗時且艱難的任務。自2026年初 Opus4.
AI 系統 RFdiffusion3 能從原子層面造蛋白:實驗裡真能幹活
更硬核的是,用它全新設計的蛋白質,已在真實化學反應中兌現了預期功能。由美國華盛頓大學、英國牛津大學、英偉達等機構組成的國際團隊搭建了這套系統,可對單個原子建模,專門用於設計蛋白質與核酸,相關成果於當地時間 16 日刊登在國際期刊《科學》上。
迪士尼將以2000萬美元收購Character.AI部分資產並接納核心團隊
據彭博社披露的法律文件顯示,迪士尼已同意以2000萬美元收購 Character.AI 的部分資產,並向至少60名員工(佔其員工總數的大多數)提供總額約6000萬美元年薪的就業機會,目前絕大多數受邀員工已接受試探性報價。此次收購與人才吸納,凸顯了傳統娛樂巨頭在人工智能浪潮下對垂直領域技術團隊的深度整合。
不操控鍵鼠、自己寫代碼:4 個 Gemini 智能體在《我的世界》裡自主組隊擊敗末影龍
4個 Gemini4Argon 通用編碼智能體,在沒有人類替它們分派任何角色的情況下,僅憑遊戲內的聊天頻道和一份共享筆記,就自己商量著完成了分工,然後一頭扎進一個隨機生成的《我的世界》生存世界裡。這場硬仗打了27小時14分鐘,它們最終通關,把末影龍撂倒。
垂直大模型"同源觀瀾"在福州發佈:用 AI 把兩岸共同歷史記憶"激活"
10月18日,中華文化傳承與兩岸融合發展垂直大模型"同源觀瀾"在福建師範大學旗山校區正式發佈,它的使命很明確——用數字技術把兩岸共享的歷史記憶重新盤活。福建師範大學校長鄭家建點出了這套系統要解決的真實痛點:涉臺檔案資料浩如煙海,整理和考辨的難度極高。
Vercel數據表明決策模型Jev成史上採用最快AI模型
Jev於9月15日限量發佈,通過限制預設輸出數量實現更高速度與更低成本,成為快速分類大量數據的理想選擇,並已促使OpenAI和亞馬遜等公司推出競品。作為早期採用者,Vercel已利用Jev取代GPT-6Luna來識別有害指令。相關數據源自類似OpenRouter的統一 API 服務VercelAI網關,該報告同時指出開源模型已佔據處理代幣的70% 以上及總支出的近25%,而前沿實驗室支出亦實現十倍增長。